← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
4,093 records · $109.16B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Williams, Sherwood Secured Income Fund, WFG Holdings, Morgan Peabodysource ↗ | Filing | State-court filings (notable) | Los Angeles Superior Court | 2026-10-15 | |
| Arete Financialsource ↗ common fund · ~19K members · ≈$140.47/member gross | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-10-15 | $2.60M | |
| Institute for Human Resources and Servicessource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | ||
| CBIZ Benefits & Insurance Servicessource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | $485K | |
| BuyAlertssource ↗ | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | 2026-10-15 | ||
| Progressivesource ↗ common fund · ~$383/member · No. 1:21-cv-06243-LGS | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | 2026-10-15 | $8M |
| Etairos Healthsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | $4K | |
| Progressive Auto Insurancesource ↗ common fund · Varies /member · No. 1:22-cv-00878-SKC-TKO | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Not specified | 2026-10-15 | $15.24M |
| A.S. Researchsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-10-15 | $775K | |
| 8 Figure Dream Lifestylesource ↗ common fund · ~1K members · ≈$813.01/member gross | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-10-15 | $1.10M | |
| Scribd Inc.source ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-10-15 | $3M | |
| Coulter Motor Companysource ↗ common fund · ~6K members · ≈$397.24/member gross | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-10-15 | $2.30M | |
| Credit Karma LLCsource ↗ common fund · ~51K members · ≈$49.03/member gross | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-10-15 | $2.50M | |
| A1 Janitorial Supply Corp.source ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-10-15 | $2.60M | |
| ACRO Servicessource ↗ common fund · ~7,687 members · ≈$1.1K/member gross | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-10-15 | $6.20M | |
| Career Education Corporationsource ↗ common fund · ~4K members · ~$200/member · class counsel: Motley Rice Llc, Sperling & Slater, Sperling & Slater, PC · defense: Jones Day, Jones Day (CH), Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP · No. 10-cv-05260 · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | United States District Court Northern District of Illinois | 2026-10-15 | $29M |
| Safe Fleetsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | ||
| Renters Warehousesource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-10-15 | $195K | |
| Twin Cities Pain Clinicsource ↗ claims-made | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | ||
| TRC Staffing Servicessource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | $1.70M | |
| State Farmsource ↗ common fund · ~450K members · up to 21% of premiums paid (minimum limits) or up to 13% of premiums paid (non-minimum limits) /member · fees: one-third of the Settlement Fund · class counsel: Hausfeld LLP, Stueve Siegel Hanson, LLP - KCMO, KalielGold PLLC, Van Winkle Law Firm · defense: Stinson LLP - JC, Alston & Bird LLP · No. 18-CV-00328-KWR-SCY · view case timeline → | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | District Court, New Mexico | 2026-10-15 | $8.80M |
| Tift Regional Health System and Southwellsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | $1.20M | |
| Lumen Inc (formerly CenturyLink, Inc.)source ↗ | Verdict | Privacy & Wiretap | United States District Court, District of Arizona | 2026-10-15 | $140M |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co.source ↗ filed by Usher Law Group P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-06631 · 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III web-accessibility suits like this typically survive early motions when plaintiff alleges concrete barriers, mirroring Price v. Diab's recognition of injunctive relief plus fee-shifting even on default. Small retailers rarely litigate to judgment, favoring quick settlement over prolonged discovery. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief and attorney's fees even via default, incentivizing filing against small defendants like OPPO. Main risk: No compensatory damages under ADA Title III; recovery depends on fee-shifting and injunctive compliance costs, capping monetary exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$20K No direct settlement or verdict data for this defendant or theory; estimate relies on general ADA web-accessibility litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D.N.Y | 2026-10-15 | $2K–$20K rough EV |
| Lands' Endsource ↗ claims-made | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-10-15 | ||
| Durranisource ↗ The court held the trial errors were harmless so no new trial was warranted, prejudgment interest was properly awarded given settlement negotiations, but attorney fees we · view case timeline → | Opinion | State statutes — IL / OH / MI / MO | Ohio Ct. App. | 2026-10-14 | affirmed in part, reversed in part |
| DriveWealth, LLCsource ↗ filed by AWK Survivor Advocate Attorneys · No. 1:26-cv-09049 · 28:1332 Diversity Action · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Tracking/disclosure-based privacy claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading-stage scrutiny, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim and Integris's state privacy claims were dismissed or left unclear. DriveWealth's wiretap theory likely hinges on similar tracking-technology consent issues with no settled S.D.N.Y. precedent cited here. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr.: confidentiality claim via tracking tech survived MTD, showing plausible path for DriveWealth's analogous wiretap theory. Main risk: Dismissal on consent/exemption grounds, as in Tower Health (Meta Pixel claim dismissed) or Nuance (statutory exemption defeated BIPA claims) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2M–$40M Small sample size, unclear exact class size/user base for B2B infrastructure provider, and no prior DriveWealth litigation history to calibrate risk. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-10-14 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing, LLCsource ↗ Judge Joseph Robert Goodwin · No. 2:26-cv-00660 · 28:1453(b) - Class Action Fairness Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | S.D.W. Va | 2026-10-14 | |
| HAMILTON EYE INSTITUTE, P.C.source ↗ filed by LAW OFFICES OF ERIC A. SHORE PC · No. 5:26-cv-07883 · 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-10-14 | |
| MarketSource Insurance Services, LLC, f/k/a Salelytics, LLCsource ↗ No. 1:26-cv-01910 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Wis. | 2026-10-14 | |
| CVS Pharmacy, Inc.source ↗ filed by Buchalter, LLP · Judge James E. Simmons Jr. · No. 3:26-cv-05867 · 15:1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Rulings split sharply: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks let similar tracking/disclosure claims survive, while Tower Health and Nuance dismissed near-identical health-data-sharing and biometric claims. CVS's pharmacy-health context resembles the dismissed Tower Health Meta Pixel case most closely. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Patrick Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) - near-identical health-data tracking-tech claim dismissed with prejudice, signaling courts' reluctance absent clear unauthorized disclosure proof. Main risk: Dismissal on grounds that pharmacy health-tracking tech doesn't constitute unauthorized 'interception' absent third-party identifiable disclosure, as in Tower Health Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2.25M–$90M Small comparable sample, wide class-size uncertainty, and CVS's own settlement history diverges sharply from Big Tech comparables—treat EV as directional only. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D. Cal. | 2026-10-14 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| AAA Mid Statessource ↗ filed by Melmed Law Group, P.C. · Judge Jennifer P. Wilson · No. 1:26-cv-03068 · 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Penn. | 2026-10-14 | |
| President and Fellows of Harvard Collegesource ↗ filed by Hackett Feinberg PC · No. 1:26-cv-14655 · 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Mass. | 2026-10-14 | |
| Janney Montgomery Scottsource ↗ No. 2:26-cv-06614 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D.N.Y | 2026-10-14 | |
| Mercy Healthsource ↗ No. 4:26-cv-01721 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Mo. | 2026-10-14 | |
| Triller Group Inc.source ↗ filed by Pomerantz LLP · No. 2:26-cv-11989 · 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap and tracking-tech claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth confidentiality claim survived MTD while Santoro's Meta Pixel health-privacy claim was dismissed with prejudice; Gunnar Optiks (biometric/tracking) also survived on remand, showing fact-intensive claims often clear pleading stage. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3d Cir.) — dismissed tracking-tech privacy claim, showing courts skeptical of pixel/SDK-style disclosure theories absent concrete harm, directly analogous to app-tracking wiretap claims. Main risk: Dismissal on pleading grounds similar to Santoro/Cisneros, or inability to certify/collect given Triller's reported insolvency and unpaid $23M liabilities Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $10M–$250M Small, heterogeneous comp set; Triller's actual user/class size highly disputed and financial insolvency may cap real recovery regardless of verdict/settlement size. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | C.D. Cal. | 2026-10-14 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| Optum Financial, Inc.source ↗ No. 3:26-cv-11895 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Cal. | 2026-10-14 | |
| Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Boot Barnsource ↗ filed by PLG Damage Attorneys · No. 2:26-cv-11972 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M ▾TCPA text/robocall claims show split outcomes: Howard v. RNC and Hulce v. Zipongo affirm dismissal on technical definitions, while League of Women Voters v. Kramer let TCPA claims survive MTD. No defendant-specific exemption (like Perrong's legislator carve-out) applies to a retailer like Boot Barn. Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising and Dr $32.42M Key precedent: Howard v. RNC (9th Cir.) matters most since it's controlling 9th Cir. law on what counts as a prerecorded-voice text, directly relevant to C.D. Cal. venue. Main risk: Dismissal under 9th Circuit's narrow reading of 'artificial or prerecorded voice' calls/texts, as in Howard v. RNC. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2M–$40M Small, noisy comparable set; actual class size and consent records unknown; outcome highly fact-dependent on text content and consent practices. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | C.D. Cal. | 2026-10-14 | $29.50M–$76M comparable settlements |
| Citibank, N.A.source ↗ Judge Joan A. Lenard · No. 1:26-cv-27200 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-10-14 | |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLCsource ↗ filed by THE WASHINGTON LEGAL GROUP, LLC · Judge Rudolph Contreras · No. 1:26-cv-03578 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾Minano v. DLJ shows FCRA furnisher-specific claims often dismissed, but Equifax as a CRA faces broader exposure under §1681e(b)/1681i which survive more often; Equifax's own prior $100M+$30M+$30M settlements show large systemic liability when inaccuracies are class-wide. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital (D.D.C.) — clarifies which FCRA theories survive dismissal against reporting entities vs. furnishers, directly relevant to Equifax's posture. Main risk: Dismissal of specific FCRA counts for insufficient factual pleading, as in Minano, especially if claim lacks furnisher/CRA distinction clarity. This defendant: Equifax has multiple concurrent FCRA filings (McClary, Harris x2, Ali, Porter) and a prior $2.2M Bradberry settlement, suggesting recurring systemic reporting-accuracy litigation. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$12.50M Small, mostly unrelated comparables; actual case may be individual, not class-wide, making settlement benchmarks only loosely applicable. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-10-14 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.