C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-09543
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durfee, INC.source ↗ filed by So Cal Equal Access Group · Judge Robert G. Klausner · No. 2:26-cv-09543 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for plaintiff's failure to prove effective modification, while Burton and Holmes show ADA/accessibility claims often survive or succeed at summary judgment. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - shows plaintiffs bear burden on reasonableness of accommodation, a real dismissal risk for accessibility claims. Main risk: Plaintiff may fail to show barrier/modification was readily achievable or effective, as in Lowell v. Lyft dismissal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$30K No settlements, verdicts, or defendant history on record; estimate relies on small, indirectly-related comparable set. · grounded in 6 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-26 | $2K–$30K rough EV |