← Records

Castro v. IM USA CORP.

S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25845

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
IM USA CORP.source ↗
filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC · Judge Kathleen Mary Williams · No. 1:26-cv-25845 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline →
Case comparables ▾
ADA Title III accessibility suits split on outcome: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to show effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations for plaintiffs; survival depends heavily on specificity of alleged barriers.
Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - shows plaintiffs bear burden to prove proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility pleadings.
Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$25K
Estimate reflects likely attorney's fee/injunctive resolution typical of ADA Title III cases, not a damages class; sample too small for precision. · grounded in 6 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityS.D. Fla.2026-08-26$5K–$25K
rough EV