E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-06331
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.source ↗ filed by LAW OFFICES OF LOUIS S SCHWARTZ · Judge Joshua David Wolson · No. 2:26-cv-06331 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $1.65M–$100M ▾Minano v. DLJ shows courts routinely dismiss FCRA furnisher claims lacking private right of action but allow repleading on core §1681s-2(b)/1681e(b) claims; Askins confirms bare statutory FCRA violations can still confer standing, cutting against dismissal on that ground. Comparable settlements $1.65M–$100M median $2.33M · n=10 Equifax $100M · TransUnion $8.31M · Trader Joe's $7.40M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $25–$500 (n=3) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - illustrates that several FCRA counts fail as a matter of law (no private right) while investigation/reporting claims often survive with better pleading. Main risk: Dismissal of specific FCRA subsections lacking private right of action (as in Minano), narrowing case to a single reinvestigation claim This defendant: Experian faces a recurring pattern of individual FCRA filings (Harding, Fuller, Butler, Stanislaus, Logan, Kancharla) suggesting routine, low-severity disputes rather than systemic exposure Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): – Small, heterogeneous comparable set; case is individual not class, so settlement/verdict comparables (mostly class actions) only loosely apply. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-26 | $1.65M–$100M comparable settlements |