S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25889
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.source ↗ filed by Adams & Associates, P.A. · Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga · No. 1:26-cv-25889 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables split: Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiff failed to prove modification effectiveness, while Holmes affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment; S.D. Fla. is a high-volume ADA Title III venue with mixed MTD outcomes. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts require plaintiff to prove reasonableness/effectiveness of requested accommodation, a common dismissal ground here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation/modification, as in Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$15K Small, non-uniform comparable set; no settlement or verdict data specific to Monro or this theory limits precision. · grounded in 6 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-27 | $2K–$15K rough EV |