S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07315
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fear of God, LLCsource ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · No. 1:26-cv-07315 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to prove reasonableness of modifications, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment, showing outcome hinges heavily on factual record and remedy specificity. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - controls in this circuit; shows ADA accessibility claims dismissed absent proof that requested modification is reasonable/effective. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft's reasonableness-burden analysis. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$3.75M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no direct settlement or verdict data for this defendant or theory; figures are illustrative ranges only. · grounded in 6 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-27 | –$3.75M rough EV |