S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25835
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOPGOLF INTERNATIONAL, LLCsource ↗ filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC · Judge Kevin Michael Moore · No. 1:26-cv-25835 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to show effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Title III accessibility claims like this typically survive early MTD but often yield injunctive relief only, not damages. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows courts scrutinize whether plaintiff proved a reasonable, effective accommodation, a likely defense hurdle here. Main risk: Plaintiff may fail to plead/prove a concrete, effective accessibility modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft, leading to dismissal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$12K No settlement or verdict data for this defendant/theory; ADA Title III generally bars monetary damages absent state-law overlay, so EV is fee/injunction-driven, not class-based. · grounded in 6 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-26 | –$12K rough EV |