S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07327
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumber2love, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07327 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA liability showing courts will enforce access claims, but Lowell v. Lyft shows dismissal where plaintiff fails to prove requested accommodation is reasonable/effective. Small-business defendant profile suggests a single-plaintiff/tester suit rather than a certified class. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — controls SDNY ADA reasoning; plaintiff bears burden to show requested fix is feasible, a frequent failure point in website-access suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, provably effective accommodation, mirroring Lowell v. Lyft's reasoning. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$188K No settlement or verdict data specific to this defendant; estimate relies on analogous ADA website-access litigation patterns and thin comparable set. · grounded in 6 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-27 | $2K–$188K rough EV |