← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
2,720 records · $65.30B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equifaxsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | 2026-08-31 | $100M | |
| YouTube TVsource ↗ | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | California | 2026-08-31 | |
| Just4Veterans LLCsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-08-31 | $750K | |
| Catholic Health / Serviceaidesource ↗ claims-made | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-31 | ||
| BridgeCrest Credit Company, LLCsource ↗ Judge Jean-Paul Boulee · No. 1:26-cv-04969 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-31 | |
| Trinity Financial Systems, Inc.source ↗ filed by The Marks Law Firm, PC · Judge Stanley A. Boone · No. 1:26-cv-06956 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are largely inapposite (ECOA disparate-impact OLC opinion, ADA fee-shifting in Price v. Diab), giving little direct precedent on merits. Price v. Diab shows courts readily grant injunctive relief/fees once liability is established via default, suggesting plaintiffs often prevail procedurally. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms ADA plaintiffs can recover fees/injunctive relief even on default judgment, raising defendant's exposure to cost beyond damages. Main risk: Title III ADA claims allow no compensatory damages, so recovery depends on fee-shifting and any pendant NY state/city human rights claims. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$15K Extremely limited comparable data; figures are rough proxies pending actual settlement or verdict data for this defendant/theory. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Cal. | 2026-08-31 | –$15K rough EV |
| Arrowhead Regional Computing Consortiumsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Doximsource ↗ common fund · ~$100/member · class counsel: The Miller Law Firm · No. 2:24-cv-11550 · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division | 2026-08-31 | $5.50M |
| People Data Labssource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Bursor & Fisher P.A. · defense: ZwillGen PLLC, ZwillGen Law LLP · view case timeline → | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | Colorado | 2026-08-31 | $6.36M |
| Metropolis Technologiessource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Tennessee | 2026-08-31 | $6.50M |
| BMWsource ↗ | Settlement | Product Liability | 2026-08-31 | $2K | |
| State Farmsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Bailey & Glasser LLP, Carney Bates & Pulliam, PLLC, Jacobson Phillips PLLC, Normand, PLLC · defense: Barber Munson, Wheeler Trigg O'Donnell LLP, Alston & Bird LLP · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | District Court, New Mexico | 2026-08-31 | $20.90M |
| Eisner Advisory Groupsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-31 | $1.05M | |
| The Money Source Inc.source ↗ common fund · ~$286/member · class counsel: The Weitz Firm, LLC, Law Office of Chris R. Miltenberger, PLLC · No. CV-23-00235-PHX-JJT | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | United States District Court for the District of Arizona | 2026-08-31 | $1.50M |
| Watershed Foodssource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-08-31 | $122K | |
| Colgate-Palmolive / Tom's of Mainesource ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | E.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-31 | $2.90M |
| Pawn America / Payday America / PAL Cardsource ↗ common fund · ~679,604 members · up to $5,000 (documented loss) + $30 (classwide) + $50 (California residents) /member · No. 21-cv-02554 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota | 2026-08-31 | $3.19M |
| YouTube / Googlesource ↗ common fund · ~1,000,000 members · ~$25/member | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose) | 2026-08-31 | $7.50M |
| Costcosource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Washington | 2026-08-31 | $14M |
| Sproutssource ↗ common fund · TBD /member · No. 22STCV26572 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Los Angeles County Superior Court | 2026-08-31 | $5M |
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Law Offices of Mark A. Carey, P.C. · Judge Steve CarMichael Jones · No. 1:26-cv-04950 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-30 | |
| Concord Hospitalsource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Flo Healthsource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Law Offices of Mark A. Carey, P.C. · Judge Amy Mil Totenberg · No. 1:26-cv-04949 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-29 | |
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Oise Law Group PC · Judge Walter E. Johnson · No. 1:26-cv-04948 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-29 | |
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Oise Law Group PC · Judge Steven Daniel Grimberg · No. 1:26-cv-04946 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-29 | |
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Oise Law Group PC · Judge Eleanor Louise Ross · No. 1:26-cv-04928 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-28 | |
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Oise Law Group PC · Judge Eleanor Louise Ross · No. 1:26-cv-04921 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-28 | |
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Oise Law Group PC · Judge Sarah E. Geraghty · No. 1:26-cv-04923 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-28 | |
| TOP CHOICE HOME CARE LLCsource ↗ Judge Joel Harvey Slomsky · No. 2:26-cv-06448 · 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-28 | |
| TRANS UNION LLCsource ↗ Judge Paul Steven Diamond · No. 2:26-cv-06462 · 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-28 | |
| Chobani, LLCsource ↗ filed by Reese LLP · No. 1:26-cv-05339 · 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud · view case timeline → | Filing | False Advertising | E.D.N.Y | 2026-08-28 | |
| Dupray USA LLCsource ↗ filed by Siri & Glimstad LLP · No. 1:26-cv-05346 · 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute · view case timeline → | Filing | False Advertising | E.D.N.Y | 2026-08-28 | |
| KIND LLCsource ↗ No. 1:26-cv-07380 · 28:1332fr Diversity-Fraud · view case timeline → | Filing | False Advertising | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-28 | |
| Fifth Third Bank, National Association (Inc.)source ↗ Judge Michael Lawrence Brown · No. 1:26-cv-04929 · 28:1446 Notice of Removal - Fraud · view case timeline → | Filing | False Advertising | N.D. Ga. | 2026-08-28 | |
| Nguyensource ↗ The court held that the standard borrower agreement attached to the original complaint failed to satisfy the Debt Buyers Act's attachment requirement, later documentation · view case timeline → | Opinion | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | Cal. Ct. App. | 2026-08-28 | Affirmed in part, reversed in part |
| Tower Healthsource ↗ The Third Circuit affirmed dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint with prejudice and denial of the motion for reconsideration, holding the District Court did not abuse · view case timeline → | Opinion | Privacy & Wiretap | 3rd Cir. | 2026-08-28 | affirmed |
| GUAMA II, LLCsource ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · Judge Roy Kalman Altman · No. 1:26-cv-25913 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Outcome is fact-specific and turns on barrier proof and standing at pleading stage. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - plaintiffs bear burden to prove proposed accommodation is effective; failure to do so is fatal, relevant to accessibility barrier claims here. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of standing or failure to plead a concrete, plausible barrier, as seen in Lowell v. Lyft's affirmed dismissal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$15K No settlement or verdict data specific to this theory/defendant; web signals are noisy/unrelated, class size assumed as single plaintiff typical of Title III ADA suits. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $5K–$15K rough EV |
| SANTA CLARA PLAZA LLCsource ↗ filed by Law Office of Ramon J. Diego, P.A. · Judge Darrin Phillip Gayles · No. 1:26-cv-25914 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits split on outcome: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonableness, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment, showing fact-intensive results. Price v. Diab shows even default/injunctive wins can trigger fee disputes. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms ADA plaintiffs recover fees as 'prevailing party' even via default judgment, shaping likely settlement leverage here. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of standing or failure to show reasonable/effective modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K Single-plaintiff ADA accessibility suit; no settlement or verdict data specific to this theory, estimate highly uncertain. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $2K–$10K rough EV |
| Famous Dave's of America, Inc.source ↗ filed by Brasil , Brasil PA · Judge Rodney Smith · No. 1:26-cv-25925 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are mostly outside ADA public-accommodation context; Lowell v. Lyft shows courts will dismiss ADA claims where plaintiff can't prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims can survive summary judgment when well-supported. No direct Title III accessibility precedent in the sample weakens predictive strength. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. — shows ADA accessibility claims can be dismissed if plaintiff fails burden on reasonableness/effectiveness of requested accommodation, a common defense in S.D. Fla. ADA suits. Main risk: Standing/mootness dismissal common in S.D. Fla. ADA 'tester' suits, plus Lowell-style failure to prove requested fix is required or effective. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$11K Sample lacks any direct ADA Title III public-accommodation comparables; estimate relies on general litigation pattern knowledge, not the provided rulings. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $2K–$11K rough EV |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.