D. Colo. · No. 1:26-cv-05296
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oneflight International, Inc.source ↗ filed by Ireland Stapleton Pryor & Pascoe PC · Judge Nina Y. Wang · No. 1:26-cv-05296 · 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $200M–$688M ▾No comparable rulings in the dataset directly address false advertising claims against a private charter broker; closest analogs (Guthrie, Citizens of Humanity) show courts often reject or narrow UCL/false-ad claims absent uniform misrepresentation proof. Two prior suits (JINNAH, Hillin) against Oneflight suggest a recurring complaint pattern that could bolster plausibility at the pleading stage. Comparable settlements $200M–$688M median $225M · n=10 Merck & Co. Inc. a $688M · Toyota Industries $436M · Toyota Industries $299.50M Per member (realized): ~$2,500 median · $2,500–$2,500 (n=1) Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · VPX, Inc. $293M Key precedent: Guthrie v. Transamerica Life Ins. Co. — shows courts frequently deny class treatment of false-advertising/UCL claims needing individualized reliance proof, a likely defense hurdle here. Main risk: Individualized reliance/causation issues (as in Guthrie) could defeat class certification or merits even if initial pleading survives. This defendant: Two prior False Advertising filings (JINNAH, Hillin) against Oneflight suggest a pattern of similar consumer complaints. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $90K–$9M Tiny, thematically distant comparable set; true class size and per-member damages depend on undisclosed membership/prepayment data. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts | Filing | False Advertising | D. Colo. | 2026-10-16 | $200M–$688M comparable settlements |