5th Cir.
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Mahoney'ssource ↗ The Fifth Circuit held that plaintiff plausibly alleged a particularized injury-in-fact under Article III because widespread, systematic mislabeling of fish over years at · view case timeline → | Opinion | False Advertising | 5th Cir. | 2026-10-16 | reversed and remanded |