N.D. Ill. · No. 1:26-cv-12754
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phreesia, Inc.source ↗ filed by Hedin LLP · No. 1:26-cv-12754 · Civil Miscellaneous Case · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Analogous healthcare tracking-tech claims split: Doe v. Bayhealth survived a breach-of-confidentiality theory, while Santoro v. Tower Health (Meta Pixel, healthcare context) was dismissed with prejudice; Doe v. Integris Health left state privacy claims unresolved after remand. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider duty of confidentiality for tracking-tech disclosures closely mirrors Phreesia's patient-facing intake platform. Main risk: Santoro v. Tower Health dismissal shows healthcare pixel/tracking claims can fail decisively on pleading and causation grounds, especially with delay in amendment. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2M–$70M No Phreesia-specific rulings exist; estimate relies on analogous healthcare-tracking cases and unresolved class-size data. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ill. | 2026-10-18 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |