← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
2,720 records · $65.30B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Nutritionsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Lynch Carpenter, LLP, Blood Hurst O'Reardon LLP, Altair Law · defense: Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Venable LLP, Duane Morris LLP · No. 24CV072746 · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | Superior Court of California, County of Alameda | 2026-08-25 | $90M |
| Discoversource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Kick Law Office APC, Kick Law Firm, APC, Lieff Cabraser Heimann and Bernstein LLP · defense: HWG LLP, Covington & Burling LLP · No. 1:23-CV-4676 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois | 2026-08-25 | $1.20B |
| Avis Rent a Car System LLCsource ↗ The Third Circuit held that the rental car defendants did not impliedly waive their arbitration rights merely by conducting limited discovery (including depositions) befo · view case timeline → | Opinion | False Advertising | 3rd Cir. | 2026-08-24 | vacated and remanded |
| Adventist Health System/Westsource ↗ The appellate court held plaintiffs forfeited their section 632(a) claim by failing to brief it, affirmed denial of certification for the patient portal subclass's CMIA c · view case timeline → | Opinion | False Advertising | Cal. Ct. App. | 2026-08-24 | affirmed in part, reversed in part |
| Signature Property Solutions, Inc.source ↗ No. 1:26-cv-10168 · view case timeline → | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | N.D. Ill. | 2026-08-24 | |
| 33 Mile Radius LLCsource ↗ Judge Joseph Dawson III · No. 2:26-cv-03627 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | D.S.C. | 2026-08-24 | |
| Redfin Corporationsource ↗ No. 0:26-cv-62332 · 28:1441 Notice of Removal · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-24 | |
| Psycho Bunny, Incsource ↗ Judge Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe · No. 6:26-cv-01865 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-08-24 | |
| Walmart Inc.source ↗ Judge Richard T. Gurley · No. 1:26-cv-03900 · 42:12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA) · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | D. Colo. | 2026-08-24 | |
| Raptor Technologies, LLCsource ↗ filed by Consumer Justice Law Firm PLC · No. 3:26-cv-00288 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $1.65M–$100M ▾FCRA furnisher claims are frequently narrowed (Minano v. DLJ Mortgage dismissed most counts for no private right of action), but bare statutory disclosure violations can survive (Askins v. CRST). Raptor's business (visitor/background screening) resembles Xactus/RentGrow, both of which settled modestly. Comparable settlements $1.65M–$100M median $2.33M · n=10 Equifax $100M · TransUnion $8.31M · Trader Joe's $7.40M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $25–$500 (n=3) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - shows courts routinely dismiss FCRA furnisher/reporting claims absent concrete injury pleading, a likely early hurdle here. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of private right of action or insufficient concrete-injury pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$3M Class size is inferred, not confirmed; small defendant revenue likely caps any resolution well below FCRA statutory ceiling. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | S.D. Tex. | 2026-08-24 | $1.65M–$100M comparable settlements |
| WK Kellogg Cosource ↗ filed by Gucovschi Law Firm, PLLC · No. 2:26-cv-09438 · 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $90M–$586M ▾False advertising claims against national food companies often survive early motions when deceptive labeling is plausibly pled, but comparables here are largely unrelated (Guthrie affirmed denial of class cert on similar UCL claims; Citizens of Humanity shows underlying 'Made in USA' labeling suits can fail on probable cause). Comparable settlements $90M–$586M median $117.50M · n=10 Western Union $586M · Toyota Industries $436M · Credit Glory $200M Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · VPX, Inc. $293M Key precedent: Guthrie v. Transamerica - shows courts scrutinize individualized reliance/communications in UCL false-advertising class claims, a likely defense theme here. Main risk: Class certification denial on individualized reliance/exposure grounds, as in Guthrie v. Transamerica Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $20M–$120M No directly on-point food false-advertising rulings or defendant-specific history; estimate relies on analogized settlement data and general consumer-class norms. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts | Filing | False Advertising | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-24 | $90M–$586M comparable settlements |
| Costcosource ↗ | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | Washington | 2026-08-24 | |
| Cone Health (MyChart)source ↗ common fund | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-08-24 | $1.70M | |
| HSBCsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-08-24 | $495K | |
| MemorialCaresource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-24 | $750K | |
| Compex Legal Servicessource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-24 | $872K | |
| Generacsource ↗ common fund · No. 2:23-cv-00683-LA | Settlement | False Advertising | Eastern District of Wisconsin | 2026-08-24 | $15M |
| State Farmsource ↗ common fund · ~$20/member · No. 03-CV-2024-901729.00 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama | 2026-08-24 | $15.60M |
| Western Unionsource ↗ common fund · Varies /member · class counsel: Robert A Waller Jr., Law Office of, ROMANCORE LAW, PC · defense: Holland & Hart LLP, Sidley Austin LLP · No. 1:17-cr-00011-CCC · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania | 2026-08-24 | $586M |
| HCF Managementsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Clay-Platte Family Medicine Clinicsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-24 | $1M | |
| National Tenant Networksource ↗ common fund · Pro rata payment /member · No. 2:23-cv-03545-MCA-LDW | Settlement | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | Not specified | 2026-08-24 | $1.63M |
| Heritage South Credit Unionsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Mount Sinai Medical Centersource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Equinox Inc.source ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-08-24 | $685K | |
| Googlesource ↗ common fund · No. 5:23-cv-03101 | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-08-24 | $8.25M |
| Legends Hospitalitysource ↗ common fund · ~16,258 members · ~$200/member · No. 160486/2025 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | New York | 2026-08-24 | $813K |
| Robinhoodsource ↗ common fund · ~$18/member · No. 4:20-cv-09328-YGR | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Oakland Division | 2026-08-24 | $2M |
| Whirlpool Maytagsource ↗ common fund · No. 1:24-cv-00188-MN | Settlement | Product Liability | United States District Court, District of Delaware | 2026-08-23 | $21M |
| Live Nationsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Glancy Prongay Wolke and Rotter LLP, Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, The Rosen Law Firm PA · defense: Latham and Watkins LLP, Latham and Watkins · No. 2:23-cv-06343-KK · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | United States District Court for the Central District of California | 2026-08-23 | $8.80M |
| Equifaxsource ↗ common fund · ~147,000,000 members · ~$125/member · No. 1:22-cv-04754-MLB | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia | 2026-08-23 | $380.50M |
| Metasource ↗ common fund · ~29,000,000 members · ~$29/member · No. 3:18-md-02843-VC | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-08-23 | $725M |
| 3Msource ↗ common fund · No. 2:18-mn-2873-RMG | Settlement | Product Liability | United States District Court for the District of South Carolina | 2026-08-23 | $6B |
| Volkswagensource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California | 2026-08-23 | $14.70B |
| Wells Fargo Securities, LLCsource ↗ The court held that only the retaliatory discharge claim was supported by sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury, so it affirmed the verdict and award only to the exte · view case timeline → | Opinion | ADA / Accessibility | 4th Cir. | 2026-08-21 | Affirmed in part, reversed in part |
| Volkswagen Group of Americasource ↗ claims-made | Settlement | Product Liability | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey | 2026-08-21 | |
| Pelican Intl USA LLCsource ↗ No. 3:26-cv-01240 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ind. | 2026-08-21 | |
| Empava Appliances Inc.source ↗ filed by Horowitz Law, Pllc · Judge Thomas Michael Durkin · No. 1:26-cv-10109 · 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA claims survived in Holmes v. Bax and Price v. Diab, but both turned on fee-shifting/injunctive nuances rather than damages; no on-point web-accessibility ruling exists for a retailer like Empava. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms ADA plaintiffs can recover attorney's fees as prevailing parties even via default judgment, framing likely relief sought here. Main risk: Title III ADA claims allow only injunctive relief/fees, not damages, capping recovery regardless of class size (per Price v. Diab). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$125K No direct web-accessibility precedent or settlement data for Empava; estimate relies on analogous ADA fee-shifting cases and industry norms. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | N.D. Ill. | 2026-08-21 | $5K–$125K rough EV |
| STAR PROPERTY XVI LLCsource ↗ filed by Law Office of Ramon J. Diego, P.A. · Judge Jacqueline Becerra · No. 1:26-cv-25717 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility rulings split: Price v. Diab and Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA liability/injunctive relief, but Burton shows fee-shifting and mootness issues can unravel remedies. No settlement or verdict data exists for this specific theory to anchor value. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms plaintiff can recover fees as prevailing party even via default judgment, key leverage point here. Main risk: Mootness via voluntary remediation, as in Burton, could eliminate injunctive claim and complicate fee recovery. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$9K Small, non-analogous comparable set; defendant identity unconfirmed in web signals, limiting class-size and pattern inference. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-21 | $2K–$9K rough EV |
| Kimsource ↗ filed by Open Access Law, APC · No. 2:26-cv-09360 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-21 |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.