E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07848
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS, INC.source ↗ filed by The Kim Law Firm, LLC · Judge Gail a. Weilheimer · No. 2:26-cv-07848 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾Minano v. DLJ shows FCRA furnisher claims often dismissed absent private right of action or insufficient pleading, while Askins confirms bare statutory disclosure violations can survive dismissal. LexisNexis faces multiple concurrent FCRA filings (Hansen, Bennett, Deane, Roberts), suggesting recurring exposure but inconsistent judicial outcomes. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — illustrates courts dismissing several FCRA theories against data furnishers/CRAs for lack of statutory basis or pleading deficiency, a likely template for LexisNexis motions. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or concrete injury, as in Minano (3 of 6 claims dismissed with prejudice) This defendant: Pattern of repeat FCRA filings against LexisNexis Risk Solutions (5 concurrent cases) indicates systemic reporting/dispute-handling exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.12M–$21M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no direct LexisNexis Risk Solutions trial outcomes; class size and per-member figures are rough proxies from sibling-entity settlement. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-10-13 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |