Rivera v. Personify Health, Inc.

D. Colo. · No. 1:26-cv-05159

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Personify Health, Inc.source ↗ filed by Coleman PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-05159 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M ▾ TCPA robocall claims show split outcomes: Howard and Perrong narrowed liability on technical grounds, while League of Women Voters v. Kramer let similar robocall claims survive MTD. Personify's B2B wellness-platform model may raise consent/vendor-relationship defenses similar to Hulce's 'telephone solicitation' carveout. Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising and Dr $32.42M Key precedent: Hulce v. Zipongo (7th Cir.) — health-related outreach calls were not 'solicitations,' a defense Personify (health platform) could mirror. Main risk: Dismissal on prior-express-consent or 'health-related call' exemption grounds, as in Hulce and Howard Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $500K–$5M No prior Personify litigation history; class size is inferred from platform scope, not verified user counts. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts	Filing	Robocalls & Texts (TCPA)	D. Colo.	2026-10-12	$29.50M–$76M comparable settlements