E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07815
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANS UNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by The Kim Law Firm, LLC · No. 2:26-cv-07815 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾FCRA furnisher claims often survive initial pleading but face dismissal on specific counts, as in Minano v. DLJ (dismissed private-right-of-action counts, allowed others without prejudice). Askins shows bare statutory FCRA violations can support standing, cutting toward survival here. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. — shows courts parse FCRA counts individually; some survive, some dismissed for lack of private right of action. Main risk: Dismissal of specific FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient factual pleading, as seen in Minano. This defendant: TransUnion faces repeat FCRA filings (6 prior records), suggesting systemic reporting-accuracy litigation exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.25M–$150M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; actual case may be individual not class, and class size/per-member figures are speculative absent case-specific facts. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-10-12 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |