M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02351
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equifax Information Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Marcus & Zelman, LLC · Judge Paul Gregory Byron · No. 6:26-cv-02351 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾FCRA furnisher claims show mixed outcomes: Minano dismissed several FCRA counts for no private right of action while letting others proceed without prejudice; Askins found bare disclosure violations sufficient for standing, suggesting some claims survive early motions. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — illustrates that FCRA furnisher claims against entities like Equifax often survive only in narrowed form after MTD. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano This defendant: Equifax has repeated FCRA filings (Harris x2, McClary, Ali, Porter) and settled Bradberry for $2.2M, showing recurring furnisher-dispute exposure Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$10M Case filing lacks detail on class status or specific FCRA section invoked; estimate relies heavily on analogous Equifax furnisher suits. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-09 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |