D. Colo. · No. 1:26-cv-05179
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexisNexis Risk Solutions Incsource ↗ filed by RAMOS LAW · No. 1:26-cv-05179 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage shows FCRA claims against furnishers/CRAs are routinely dismissed for lacking private right of action or insufficient pleading, while Askins confirms bare statutory violations can still support standing, creating split outcomes for similar FCRA theories. Comparable settlements $2.40M–$100M median $5.85M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax Informatio $30M · Equifax $30M Per member (realized): ~$250 median · $25–$500 (n=5) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. — directly parallels FCRA furnisher claims likely at issue here and shows courts narrowly construe private rights of action under §1681s-2 and §1681i. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital This defendant: Multiple concurrent FCRA/FDCPA filings (Hansen, Bennett, Deane, Murphy) against LexisNexis Risk Solutions suggest a recurring pattern of consumer reporting disputes, not isolated incident. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$6M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no case-specific facts on class certification or merits strength, so figures are rough order-of-magnitude only. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D. Colo. | 2026-10-13 | $2.40M–$100M comparable settlements |