← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
2,720 records · $65.30B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elite Events & Tickets LLCsource ↗ Judge James Randal Hall · No. 1:26-cv-00142 · 15:0045 Federal Trade Commission Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D. Ga. | 2026-07-27 | |
| MIDWEST PETROL GROUP INC.source ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · Judge Beth Francine Bloom · No. 1:26-cv-25043 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits typically yield injunctive relief plus fees, not per-member damages; Price v. Diab confirms fee-shifting even on default judgment, but underlying liability standards remain fact-specific. Key precedent: Price v. Diab - establishes prevailing-party fee entitlement even via default judgment, relevant to litigation cost exposure. Main risk: No compensatory damages available under Title III; suit may resolve via injunction + fee award only, limiting monetary exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$15K Small, non-analogous sample (OLC opinion, single 9th Cir. fee ruling); no direct ADA accessibility settlement data for this defendant or theory. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | $2K–$15K rough EV |
| LGC Boca LLCsource ↗ filed by Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA · Judge Anuraang H. Singhal · No. 0:26-cv-62054 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs who secure injunctive relief can recover fees, incentivizing filing, but the OLC opinion shows disparate-impact theories often fail absent clear intentional conduct. Small, non-representative sample limits certainty for this defendant. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - establishes fee-shifting entitlement for ADA plaintiffs winning injunctive relief, a common outcome pattern in Title III suits. Main risk: No damages available under ADA Title III itself; recovery depends heavily on attorney's fees and quick settlement, not statutory penalty exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$8K Extremely limited comparables (no settlements, no verdicts, no defendant history); estimate is a rough directional range, not a precise valuation. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | $2K–$8K rough EV |
| Cucina Orlando, LLCsource ↗ No. 6:26-cv-01625 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | |
| Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.source ↗ filed by Ogletree Deakins, PC · No. 2:26-cv-02254 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA accessibility claims can succeed and support fee-shifting even via default judgment, but the ECOA comparable is inapposite and offers no guidance on Title III merits standards here. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA plaintiffs prevailing on accessibility claims can recover fees, showing viable path to relief. Main risk: ADA Title III provides only injunctive relief/attorney's fees, not damages, capping monetary exposure regardless of merits outcome. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$30K Small, non-analogous comparable set (one ECOA opinion, one 9th Cir. fee case); true monetary value hinges almost entirely on fee-shifting, not damages. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | –$30K rough EV |
| Menagerie Eatery and Bar, LLCsource ↗ No. 6:26-cv-01628 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | |
| Motoworks Brewing, LLCsource ↗ No. 6:26-cv-01630 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | |
| L.A. Guitar Repair Inc.source ↗ filed by Open Access Law, APC · Judge Cynthia Valenzuela · No. 2:26-cv-08250 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA accessibility claims can succeed via default/injunctive relief, but fee-shifting entitlement was reversed, showing courts scrutinize secondary remedies closely. Small single-location defendant limits scope of injunctive relief and damages exposure. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - shows injunctive relief for ADA access claims is attainable but attorney's fee recovery is not automatic. Main risk: Court denies fee-shifting or narrows injunctive scope, as in Price v. Diab's reversal on fees. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$15K No direct settlement data; single-defendant small business with no prior ADA history, high uncertainty in scope and stacking of state claims. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-07-27 | $2K–$15K rough EV |
| Equifax Information Services LLCsource ↗ filed by Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Litigation · Judge John Leonard Badalamenti · No. 8:26-cv-02168 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage shows FCRA furnisher claims often dismissed for lack of private right of action, but Askins v. CRST confirms bare statutory FCRA violations can still confer standing and survive. Equifax has repeatedly settled similar FCRA disputes ($2.2M, $600/member) rather than litigate to verdict. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.20M · n=7 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Amazon.com Inc. an $2.25M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. — directly parallels FCRA furnisher theory; some counts dismissed, others survived on repleading, showing partial viability. Main risk: Dismissal of specific FCRA counts lacking private right of action, as in Minano, could gut core claims early. This defendant: Equifax has multiple concurrent FCRA filings (McClary, Ali, Jones, Porter, Jover, Duvernois) suggesting recurring systemic reporting disputes. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$6M Single-plaintiff filing; class size and recovery figures are speculative extrapolations from unrelated Equifax settlements, not case-specific data. · grounded in 10 rulings, 7 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Toyotasource ↗ common fund · class counsel: BARON & BUDD PC, LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP · defense: KING & SPALDING LLP · No. 2:19-ml-02905-JAK-MRW | Settlement | Product Liability | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California | 2026-07-27 | $78.50M |
| Self-Help Credit Unionsource ↗ Judge Kenneth Davis Bell Sr. · No. 3:26-cv-00606 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | W.D.N.C. | 2026-07-27 | |
| Universal Logistics Holdings Incsource ↗ Judge Jonathan E. Hawley · No. 1:26-cv-01319 · 28:1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | C.D. Ill. | 2026-07-27 | |
| Equifax Information Services LLCsource ↗ filed by Patti Zabaleta Law Group · Judge James S. Moody Jr. · No. 8:26-cv-02145 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ shows FCRA furnisher claims often survive only if pled with specificity, with several counts dismissed for no private right of action. Equifax has faced repeat individual FCRA suits (Jones, Porter, Jover, Duvernois) with mixed settlement outcomes ($2.2M vs $0.0M). Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - illustrates FCRA claims against furnishers/CRAs frequently dismissed absent detailed factual allegations of inaccurate reporting or dispute mishandling. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to state a plausible FCRA claim, as in Minano, where multiple counts were dismissed for lack of specificity or no private right of action. This defendant: Equifax shows a recurring pattern of individual FCRA filings (6 in this dataset alone), suggesting frequent but low-value litigation exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): – Small sample of rulings/settlements; case appears individual not class, so aggregate value likely minimal absent certification or consolidation. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-27 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| TRANSUNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by Rkw Law Group · No. 1:26-cv-02637 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾FCRA furnisher claims often survive only partially, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage where most counts were dismissed but some allowed to proceed; Askins v. CRST shows disclosure-based FCRA claims can survive standing challenges. TransUnion's own $40M Ninth Circuit verdict shows real trial exposure once liability is established. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: TransUnion, LLC — $40.0M jury verdict (Ninth Circuit) shows this defendant has faced and lost large FCRA trials before, raising settlement leverage. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage (Counts II, III, V dismissed). This defendant: TransUnion has prior large FCRA exposure ($40M verdict) and an active related filing (Pinney v. TransUnion), suggesting recurring FCRA litigation pattern. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $40K–$22.50M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; class size and per-member figures highly speculative absent case-specific facts on scope of alleged FCRA violation. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-07-27 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Anthropic, PBCsource ↗ filed by Clarkson Law Firm, P.C. · Judge Kandis A. Westmore · No. 3:26-cv-07789 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → | Filing | False Advertising | N.D. Cal. | 2026-07-27 | |
| NFL Enterprises LLCsource ↗ filed by Potter Handy LLP | Filing | State-court filings (notable) | Superior Court of California County of Alameda | 2026-07-27 | |
| Omni Healthcaresource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Lighthouse Electricsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Pineland Community Service Boardsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-27 | $475K | |
| ZOLL Medical Corporationsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Group, Morgan & Morgan Mass Tort Dept., DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLP, DiCello Levitt LLP · defense: Baker & Hostetler LLP · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | District Court, D. Massachusetts | 2026-07-27 | $3.50M |
| Harris and Harris, LTD.source ↗ filed by Seraph Legal, PA · Judge Fred W. Slaughter · No. 8:26-cv-02022 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.20M–$7.40M ▾Fraase affirmed a furnisher's 'reasonable procedures' defense under §1681e(b), while Minano dismissed most FCRA furnisher claims for lack of private right of action; outcomes are highly fact-dependent on which FCRA provision is pled against Equifax as a CRA vs furnisher. Comparable settlements $2.20M–$7.40M median $3.62M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · Sprouts $5M · RentGrow $2.25M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — shows courts readily dismiss FCRA claims lacking private right of action or factual specificity, a recurring risk for Equifax-style defendants. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead specific inaccuracy/reasonable-procedures failure, as in Minano and Fraase. This defendant: Multiple pending FCRA filings against Equifax (McClary, Ali) suggest repeat exposure and possible consolidated/class treatment. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $45K–$13.50M Single-plaintiff filing; true class size and certification unresolved, so EV range is wide and low-confidence. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | C.D. Cal. | 2026-07-27 | $2.20M–$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Onni Paseo LLCsource ↗ No. 2:26-cv-08219 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-07-25 | |
| GAW Miners LLC, ZenMiner LLCsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: SUSMAN GODFREY LLP · defense: HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut | 2026-07-25 | $3.50M |
| Tuft & Needle LLCsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: DOVEL & LUNER LLP · defense: QUARLES & BRADY LLP | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | California Superior Court for the County of San Diego | 2026-07-25 | $2.99M |
| EMS LINQ LLCsource ↗ claims-made · class counsel: EKSM LLP · defense: BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division | 2026-07-25 | |
| Dohman, Akerlund & Eddysource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-25 | $5K | |
| TransUnion, LLCsource ↗ | Verdict | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | Ninth Circuit | 2026-07-25 | $40M |
| Google (Google Play)source ↗ Varies /member · No. 4:19-cv-04286 | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | Not specified | 2026-07-25 | $8.25M |
| Hard Rock Stadiumsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Jonathan Lee Borsuk PC, The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi, Hiraldo P.A., Squitieri & Fearon LLP · defense: Sidley Austin LLP, Baker & Hostetler, Latham & Watkins LLP, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP · No. 1:24-cv-22751-BB · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida | 2026-07-25 | $14M |
| Flo (Period Tracker)source ↗ Varies /member · No. 3:21-cv-00757 | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-07-25 | $59.50M |
| TreeHouse Foods (Waffle Recall)source ↗ ~$50/member · No. 1:24-cv-10992 | Settlement | Product Liability | U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois | 2026-07-25 | $4M |
| Michael Kors Outletsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Kopelowitz Ostrow P.A., Edelsberg Law, Kaliel Gold PLLC, Tycko & Zavareei LLP · defense: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (NY) · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | District Court, S.D. New York | 2026-07-25 | $5M |
| Poppi Sodasource ↗ ~$5/member · No. 3:24-cv-03229 | Settlement | False Advertising | United States District Court | 2026-07-25 | $8.90M |
| American National Insurance Companysource ↗ class counsel: Herold & Sager, Shay Legal, APC, Kazerouni Law Group, APC, Clarkson Law Firm PC · defense: OMelveny and Myers LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | N.D. Ca. | 2026-07-25 | |
| Immunomedics, Inc., et al.source ↗ common fund · ~$0/member · class counsel: DLA PIPER LLP (US), DLA PIPER LLP, LITE DEPALMA GREENBERG & AFANADOR, LLC · defense: DLA PIPER LLP (US), DLA PIPER LLP, MORRIS JAMES LLP · No. 2:16-cv-03335-KSH-CLW · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey | 2026-07-25 | $40M |
| Fanaticssource ↗ $10 in vouchers ($5 off vouchers, two per eligible claimant) /member · No. 2026-001293-CA-01 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, Miami-Dade County, Florida | 2026-07-25 | |
| IDS Property Casualty Insurance Companysource ↗ common fund · class counsel: CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM PLLC, NELSON BOYD PLLC · defense: SIDLEY AUSTIN (IL), SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | W.D. Wash. | 2026-07-25 | $5.21M |
| Pfizer (Chantix)source ↗ Pro rata share of up to 20% of net $44M fund based on out-of-pocket amount paid /member · No. 22-MD-3050 | Settlement | Product Liability | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York | 2026-07-25 | $44M |
| Boston Children's Health Physicianssource ↗ common fund · ~918,000 members · ~$5,000/member · No. 73692/2024 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | Supreme Court of New York in Westchester County | 2026-07-25 | $5.15M |
| Amazon Primesource ↗ ~35,000,000 members · ~$51/member · class counsel: Reese LLP · defense: Fenwick & West LLP, Fenwick and West LLP · No. FTC v. Amazon.com, Inc. · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington | 2026-07-25 |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.