M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02009
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chobani, LLCsource ↗ filed by Seraph Legal, PA · Judge Julie Sneed · No. 6:26-cv-02009 · 28:1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparables cited (BIPA, HIPAA, tracking-pixel cases) are only loosely analogous to a phthalate mislabeling claim; mixed survival rates seen in Doe v. Bayhealth (survived) vs. Santoro v. Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance (dismissed) suggest no clear trend for this fact pattern. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Class (from complaint): All consumers who purchased Chobani's yogurt products, including Nonfat Plain Greek Yogurt and Whole Milk Plain Greek Yogurt, that were marketed as containing ' Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on duty/confidentiality theory, showing courts can find viable consumer-protection duties even on thin pleadings. Main risk: Mismatch between 'Privacy & Wiretap' label and actual mislabeling claim risks dismissal for failure to state a cognizable privacy injury, as in Santoro v. Tower Health. This defendant: Chobani has prior false-advertising filings (Lombardo, Kuznicki), suggesting recurring labeling-litigation exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3M–$40M Theory label ('Privacy & Wiretap') doesn't match class definition (food mislabeling); comparables are weak analogs, so estimate is highly speculative. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-09 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |