M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02622
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIND, LLCsource ↗ filed by Seraph Legal, PA · No. 8:26-cv-02622 · 28:1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy/tracking rulings split evenly: Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed while Bayhealth's confidentiality claim and Gunnar's BIPA claim survived. No wiretap-specific precedent directly involves KIND, so outcome hinges on how court treats consent/tracking-tech theory. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) — dismissed Meta Pixel health-data claim, showing courts often reject pixel/tracking privacy theories absent clear unauthorized disclosure. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show unauthorized 'interception' or lack of consent, as in Tower Health and Integris rulings. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $500K–$43.50M Class size and per-member figures are speculative; web signals provided no reliable KIND-specific data on user base or tracking mechanism. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-09 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |