C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-10254
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soccer Plus INC.source ↗ filed by So Cal Equal Access Group · No. 2:26-cv-10254 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split roughly evenly: Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon affirmed dismissal/reversal of ADA claims, while Holmes and Price v. Diab preserved underlying ADA liability. Small-business defendant profile (Soccer Plus appears to be a niche sportswear retailer) limits scale but doesn't change legal exposure. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - plaintiff bears burden showing modification effectiveness, a frequent dismissal trigger in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation/modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft, leading to dismissal at pleading stage. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$250K Small sample size, no defendant-specific settlement or revenue data; class size and per-member figures are rough proxies from statutory minimums, not realized payouts. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-09-11 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |