← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
4,069 records · $108.68B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.source ↗ filed by Medina Morgan, LLC · Judge Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro · No. 2:26-cv-07535 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Third Circuit precedent in Santoro v. Tower Health dismissed near-identical Meta Pixel health-privacy claims with prejudice, directly binding E.D. Pa. However, Doe v. Bayhealth shows confidentiality claims against healthcare-adjacent providers can survive where a duty analogous to physician-patient relationship exists. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) - same circuit, dismissed Meta Pixel health-info sharing claim; controls E.D. Pa. outcome here. Main risk: Binding Third Circuit precedent (Tower Health) dismissing substantially similar pixel/tracking health-privacy claims in the same jurisdiction This defendant: Three prior suits (Luppino, Thompson, Myers) on identical theory suggest repeated/serial litigation over same tracking practice. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $58K–$4M No confirmed class-size or revenue data for VisionQuest; estimate relies on inferred smaller scale vs. tech-company comparables and thin sample of settlements/rulings. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.)source ↗ filed by Jason J Joy and Associates PLLC · Judge Richard Mark Gergel · No. 2:26-cv-04365 · 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Pixel/tracking privacy claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived while Tower Health and Santoro were dismissed; no 3M-specific wiretap precedent exists, so the theory's viability here is uncertain. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. shows confidentiality/tracking claims can survive MTD when duty and disclosure are well-pled, a plausible template for 3M's wiretap theory. Main risk: Dismissal on loss-causation/standing grounds similar to Tower Health, where Meta Pixel claims failed despite plausible disclosure allegations. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $6.50M–$225M No defendant-specific incident data or prior 3M privacy litigation; class size and per-member figures are rough proxies from analogous tech-sector cases. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.source ↗ filed by Medina Morgan, LLC · Judge Karen Spencer Marston · No. 2:26-cv-07538 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Third Circuit's Santoro v. Tower Health affirmed dismissal of pixel-tracking health-data claims, directly binding on E.D. Pa., cutting against survival; but Bayhealth and Integris show confidentiality/privacy claims against service providers can survive where duty-based theories are pled. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) - binding circuit precedent dismissing similar tracking-technology privacy claims, most directly controlling for E.D. Pa. Main risk: Third Circuit precedent (Tower Health) dismissing analogous Meta Pixel/tracking claims could compel dismissal in this circuit This defendant: Three prior Privacy & Wiretap filings (Luppino, Thompson, Walker) against VisionQuest suggest repeated/systemic tracking practice or recurring plaintiff-firm targeting. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $50K–$1.70M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; class size and exact tracking-technology theory unconfirmed from web signals, limiting precision. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| Smithsource ↗ Judge Aleta Arthur Trauger · No. 3:26-cv-01398 · 42:1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Tenn. | 2026-09-30 | |
| RUBIOsource ↗ filed by Davis Ndanusa Ikhlas & Saleem LLP · No. 1:26-cv-08602 · 08:1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-30 | |
| GARRITYsource ↗ Judge Joel Harvey Slomsky · No. 2:26-cv-07548 · 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Endava plcsource ↗ filed by Block & Leviton LLP · No. 1:26-cv-08608 · 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split: Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed with prejudice, while Bayhealth's confidentiality claim and Gunnar Optiks' BIPA claim survived/were remanded. Endava is a B2B IT consultancy, not a consumer platform, making precedent fit imperfect and class size uncertain. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$100 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Patrick Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) - dismissed tracking-tech privacy claim, most analogous if Endava's exposure stems from website pixel/tracking tech. Main risk: Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal akin to Tower Health, especially absent a fiduciary/confidentiality relationship like healthcare defendants in Bayhealth/Integris. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $580K–$30M Endava's B2B profile diverges sharply from consumer-tech comparables, so class size and recovery figures are highly speculative with wide error bars. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| Burnt Store Recycling, LLCsource ↗ No. 2:26-cv-02712 · 29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Steelbergsource ↗ No. 8:26-cv-02877 · 15:77 Securities Fraud · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | C.D. Cal. | 2026-09-30 | |
| E L N Inc.source ↗ No. 4:26-cv-08570 · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D. Tex. | 2026-09-30 | |
| QUINSTREET, INC.source ↗ Judge James Patrick Hanlon · No. 1:26-cv-02105 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | S.D. Ind. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Higher Education Loan Authority of the State of Missourisource ↗ Judge Cheryl Allen Lydon · No. 3:26-cv-04363 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Bambulab Usa Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08573 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims split in comparables: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax and Price v. Diab affirmed ADA liability/injunctive relief. Outcome likely turns on whether Bambulab's website/product accessibility barriers are concretely pled and remediable. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) - controls in S.D.N.Y.; shows courts demand plaintiff prove proposed accommodation is reasonable/effective, raising dismissal risk here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, provable accessibility barrier or effective remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$500K Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixing employment, facility, and web-access ADA claims; no prior Bambulab litigation history; class size highly uncertain. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-30 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |
| The Biltmore Company, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08574 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility claims split in comparables: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations while Lowell v. Lyft and Billesdon affirmed dismissal/reversal of ADA claims for failure to prove effective remedy. Outcome hinges on whether plaintiff can show a concrete, remediable barrier at Biltmore's physical or digital property. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — same circuit, affirmed dismissal because plaintiff failed to prove proposed accommodation was effective; directly governs S.D.N.Y. pleading standard here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a specific, provably effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft's reasonableness-burden analysis. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $10K–$250K No defendant-specific history; small comparable set (n=3 settlements, mixed rulings); ADA Title III lacks damages so recovery is mostly fee-shifting/injunctive value, hard to quantify precisely. · grounded in 8 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-30 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |
| Blackstone Productssource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08575 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Rockwall Studios LLCsource ↗ filed by The Marks Law Firm P.C. · No. 1:26-cv-06077 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D.N.Y | 2026-09-30 | |
| Society of St. Vincent De Paul District Council of Fort Myers, Inc.source ↗ filed by Mussman & Associates, P.A. · Judge Sheri Polster Chappell · No. 2:26-cv-02710 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Alegian Group, Inc.source ↗ filed by Mussman & Associates, P.A. · Judge Sheri Polster Chappell · No. 2:26-cv-02714 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-30 | |
| NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC.source ↗ No. 1:26-cv-01155 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D.N.C. | 2026-09-30 | |
| TRANS UNION, LLCsource ↗ No. 1:26-cv-03420 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.source ↗ filed by Thompson Consumer Law Group, PC · Judge Susan C. Rodriguez · No. 3:26-cv-00823 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | W.D.N.C. | 2026-09-30 | |
| UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND SCREENING, INC.source ↗ No. 1:26-cv-03423 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-09-30 | |
| Vasindas' Around the Clocksource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | ||
| GeoTek Inc.source ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | $2K | |
| Institute for Human Resources and Servicessource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | $2K | |
| AGIsource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-09-30 | $2K | |
| Safe Fleetsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | $2K | |
| Communications Data Groupsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | $5K | |
| Chimienti & Associatessource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | $5K | |
| Le Moyne Collegesource ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-09-30 | $243K | |
| Mental Health Associationsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | ||
| ABC Legal Servicessource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-09-30 | $2.50M | |
| Long & Foster Real Estate Inc. and Sherry B. Benson, Administrator, Estate of Johnny W. Bensonsource ↗ | Verdict | False Advertising | Fairfax County Circuit Court | 2026-09-30 | $1.03M |
| Krispy Kremesource ↗ common fund · ~$75/member · class counsel: Terpening Law PLLC, Ranchor Harris Law, PLLC · defense: Robinson Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Robinson, Bradshaw and Hinson · No. 3:25-cv-00434 · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina | 2026-09-30 | $1.60M |
| Ashley Furniture, Nectar, DreamCloud, Sienasource ↗ common fund · minimum $35 store voucher /member · No. 21STCV09403 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles | 2026-09-30 | $9M |
| The Bank of Missourisource ↗ No. 1:26-cv-11930 · view case timeline → | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | N.D. Ill. | 2026-09-29 | |
| CHIME FINANCIAL, INC.source ↗ filed by PHILADELPHIA, PA 19147 · Judge Joshua David Wolson · No. 2:26-cv-07539 · 15:1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split roughly evenly: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading-stage challenges, while Tower Health, Nuance, Walker, and Integris's state claims were dismissed or remain unclear, showing no dominant trend for tracking/wiretap theories against financial apps. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Tower Health (3d Cir.) dismissed Meta Pixel-based health-data sharing claims, illustrating courts' skepticism toward third-party tracking-tool wiretap theories absent clear unauthorized disclosure. Main risk: Dismissal on pleadings like Tower Health/Nuance if Chime's tracking tool use doesn't meet wiretap 'interception' or consent-exception thresholds. This defendant: Two prior Chime privacy/wiretap filings (Johnson, Bean) suggest repeat exposure to similar tracking-technology claims. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $65M–$450M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixes health-privacy and biometric cases; fintech-specific wiretap precedent is thin, so estimates carry wide uncertainty. · grounded in 9 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-29 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |
| COLLECTION MANAGEMENT COMPANYsource ↗ Judge Allen Cothrel Winsor · No. 5:26-cv-00278 · 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Fla. | 2026-09-29 | |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc.source ↗ Judge William Frederic Jung · No. 8:26-cv-02977 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-29 | |
| Humm Kombucha LLCsource ↗ filed by The Casey Law Firm, LLC · Judge Adrienne Nelson · No. 3:26-cv-02009 · 28:1332cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005 · view case timeline → | Filing | False Advertising | D. Or. | 2026-09-29 |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.