S.D. Ohio · No. 2:26-cv-00964
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Roof Franchising, LLCsource ↗ filed by Babin Law, LLC · Judge Algenon L. Marbley · No. 2:26-cv-00964 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $30M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy/tracking-tech rulings split: Doe v. Bayhealth allowed breach-of-confidentiality claims to survive while Doe v. Integris left state privacy claims unclear despite defeating removal; Gunnar Optiks shows courts often reject early dismissal of tech-tracking privacy claims as fact-intensive. Comparable settlements $30M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $25–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. - survived MTD on confidentiality/tracking-tech theory, closest factual analog to hotel website data claims. Main risk: Dismissal on standing/consent grounds as in Integris removal fight, or narrow statutory reading limiting wiretap claim viability. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.25M–$22.50M No direct wiretap precedent for hotel industry; class size and theory specifics (pixel/session-replay vs. call recording) unconfirmed, limiting precision. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D. Ohio | 2026-08-11 | $30M–$725M comparable settlements |