D.S.C. · No. 2:26-cv-03384
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trans Union, LLCsource ↗ filed by Hays Cauley PC · Judge Joseph Dawson III · No. 2:26-cv-03384 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split evenly: Doe v. Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived/remanded on factual disputes, while Integris and LabCorp saw claims dismissed or left unclear on procedural grounds. No wiretap-specific ruling directly mirrors Trans Union's likely tracking-technology theory, so outcome remains fact-dependent. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC and Alp $68M · Google $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. is most relevant — court allowed confidentiality claims from tracking-tech disclosures to survive, suggesting similar viability for data-sharing/wiretap theories against Trans Union. Main risk: Federal officer removal and jurisdictional dismissals (as in Integris) or narrow statutory readings (as in LabCorp) could truncate claims early. This defendant: Trans Union faces frequent FCRA/FDCPA suits, showing chronic regulatory exposure but no direct wiretap precedent yet. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $20M–$700M Small, heterogeneous comparable set mixes health-privacy and biometric cases; true wiretap-specific data for Trans Union is sparse, so range is wide and speculative. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-08-11 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |