S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-06828
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Jewels Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-06828 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits typically yield injunctive relief plus fees, not damages; Price v. Diab shows even default judgments face fee-entitlement disputes. Small sample size limits reliability of outcome prediction. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms plaintiffs can be 'prevailing parties' for fees even via default, but fee award itself was reversed/remanded, showing volatility. Main risk: Case likely resolves via injunctive relief only, with attorney's fees contested as in Price v. Diab, yielding minimal per-member monetary recovery. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$50K No settlement or verdict data specific to ADA web-access claims; estimate relies on general ADA Title III litigation patterns, not this defendant's history. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-11 | –$50K rough EV |