← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
2,720 records · $65.30B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJ Lenders Corpsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-24 | $100K | |
| Banner Healthsource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Resident Home Mattresssource ↗ | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Naper Grove Vision Caresource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-24 | $1K | |
| Physicians Primary Caresource ↗ No. 2024-CA-007737 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Lee County, Florida | 2026-07-24 | $5K |
| Memorial Health Servicessource ↗ Pro rata share /member · class counsel: Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC, Ahdoot and Wolfson PC · defense: Baker and Hostetler LLP · No. 23STCV05059 · view case timeline → | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | Los Angeles County Superior Court | 2026-07-24 | $750K |
| American National Bank & Trustsource ↗ ~$50/member · defense: Kirkland and Ellis LLP, McGuireWoods LLP, Loeb and Loeb LLP, Debevoise and Plimpton LLP · No. DC30-CV2025-1068 · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | DC30 | 2026-07-24 | |
| Tuft & Needlesource ↗ | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | California | 2026-07-24 | |
| SP Plus Corporation (Dayton International Airport)source ↗ ~$23/member · No. 16CH13568 | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | Cook County Circuit Court | 2026-07-24 | |
| Hy Cite Royal Prestigesource ↗ | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Endue Softwaresource ↗ ~118,000 members · ~$65/member · No. CACE-25-015155 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | Florida | 2026-07-24 | |
| E Benefit Solutionsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Southern Illinois Healthsource ↗ ~79,215 members · ~$18/member · No. 2023LA55 | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-24 | ||
| AstraZeneca ABsource ↗ The Tenth Circuit held that PREP Act immunity broadly covers all claims 'relating to' administration of a covered vaccine, including breach-of-contract claims, because th · view case timeline → | Opinion | Warranty & product | 10th Cir. | 2026-07-23 | reversed and remanded |
| SR Franchising, LLC, Jeffrey Alan Rutten, and Curt Skallerupsource ↗ The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's Rule 91a dismissal of Bedrock's time-barred counterclaims and the award of attorney's fees to SR Franchising, holding Bedr · view case timeline → | Opinion | State statutes — FL / TX / GA | Tex. App.-Fort Worth | 2026-07-23 | affirmed |
| CLARITY SERVICES INCsource ↗ filed by Seraph Legal Pa Tampa Fl · Judge Mark Eaton Walker · No. 4:26-cv-00353 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾FCRA furnisher/CRA claims are frequently narrowed or dismissed for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading (Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital; Soul v. Christiansen), yet bare statutory disclosure violations can survive standing challenges (Askins v. CRST). Outcome for Clarity likely hinges on which specific FCRA subsection is pled. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. - shows courts routinely dismiss FCRA furnisher claims (1681i, 1681c-2, 1681s-2(a)) absent private right of action, a direct risk for CRA-style defendant like Clarity. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or inadequate pleading, as in Minano and Soul. This defendant: Prior filing (Campbell v. Clarity Services) suggests repeat FCRA exposure but no adjudicated outcome yet. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$6M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; class size and per-member figures are speculative absent Clarity-specific settlement data. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.D. Fla. | 2026-07-23 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Cross River Banksource ↗ filed by Lehrman Law · Judge Carlos Eduardo Mendoza · No. 6:26-cv-01599 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage shows courts frequently dismiss FCRA furnisher claims (no private right of action, insufficient pleading), while Askins v. CRST shows bare disclosure violations can survive standing challenges. Cross River's FCRA/FDCPA theory likely faces similar pleading scrutiny given fintech-partner banking model. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital - most FCRA claims against furnishers dismissed for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, directly analogous to Cross River's furnisher role. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts as in Minano, where furnisher-liability claims lack private right of action absent specific statutory hooks. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $200K–$20M No defendant-specific litigation history; class size is speculative absent Cross River-specific data; wide range reflects small comparable sample and uncertain claim-specific outcomes. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-23 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Clarity Services Inc.source ↗ filed by Seraph Legal, P.A. · Judge William Frederic Jung · No. 8:26-cv-02123 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾FCRA furnisher/CRA claims often face early dismissal for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage, while disclosure-based claims can survive per Askins v. CRST. Clarity Services' status as an Experian-affiliated specialty CRA creates similar exposure to both outcomes. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Comparable verdict: TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. — shows courts readily dismiss FCRA furnisher claims (1681s-2, 1681c-2) absent private right of action or specific factual pleading, a direct risk for Clarity as a data furnisher/CRA. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA claims for lack of private right of action or inadequate factual specificity, mirroring Minano and Soul rulings. This defendant: One prior filing (Griffin v. Clarity Services) suggests recurring FCRA exposure but no resolved outcome yet to confirm pattern. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $500K–$8M Small, heterogeneous sample; no confirmed class size or defendant-specific settlement data; figures are illustrative ranges, not predictions. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-23 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Naples Soap Company, Inc.source ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · Judge Analisa Nadine Torres · No. 1:26-cv-06260 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs can secure fee-shifting even via default judgment, supporting survivability of accessibility claims. The ECOA/OLC ruling is doctrinally unrelated but signals judicial caution toward expansive liability theories not tied to explicit statutory text. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — establishes ADA plaintiffs prevailing via injunctive relief can recover fees, raising litigation leverage even without damages claim. Main risk: ADA Title III allows only injunctive relief/fees, not damages — recovery ceiling is low absent parallel state law claim (e.g., NYC Human Rights Law). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$12K Extremely thin comparable set (2 rulings, no settlements/verdicts); figures are rough directional estimates, not empirical averages. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-23 | $2K–$12K rough EV |
| Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.source ↗ filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC · Judge Beth Francine Bloom · No. 1:26-cv-24973 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III suits like Price v. Diab show plaintiffs can secure injunctive relief and fee awards even via default, but disparate-impact reasoning from OLC's ECOA opinion signals courts scrutinize theories lacking clear textual support. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms prevailing-party fee-shifting under 42 U.S.C. §12205 even absent full merits trial, key leverage for plaintiff. Main risk: Title III bars compensatory damages entirely; case value hinges on injunctive compliance and fee-shifting, not per-member payouts Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K Single-plaintiff framing likely; no class certification or damages remedy under ADA Title III, so 'per-member' reflects settlement/fee value not distributed recovery · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-07-23 | $2K–$10K rough EV |
| NVD Conscious Ventures, LLCsource ↗ Judge Kevin Michael Moore · No. 1:26-cv-24992 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-07-23 | |
| TRANS UNION, LLC.source ↗ Judge John Milton Younge · No. 2:26-cv-05168 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-07-23 | |
| Capital One Financial Corporationsource ↗ No. 8:26-cv-02118 · Civil Miscellaneous Case · view case timeline → | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-23 | |
| CAPITAL ONE NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONsource ↗ filed by Rkw Law Group · No. 1:26-cv-02600 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-07-23 | |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLCsource ↗ Judge Kai N. Scott · No. 2:26-cv-05144 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-07-23 | |
| EASTON COACH COMPANY, LLCsource ↗ filed by Francis & Mailman Pc · Judge John Michael Gallagher · No. 5:26-cv-05143 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾FCRA/FDCPA claims show split outcomes across comparables: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage dismissed several FCRA counts for no private right of action while others were dismissed without prejudice for pleading defects, but Askins v. CRST held bare disclosure violations confer standing and survived decertification. Wright v. Portfolio Recovery shows courts can favor consumers when statutory attachment/proof requirements aren't met. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Key precedent: Askins v. CRST Expedited - most analogous if this involves FCRA background-check disclosure defects for Easton Coach drivers/employees, supporting survival of bare statutory violation claims. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage where multiple FCRA counts were dismissed outright. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$150K Small, privately-held defendant with no prior litigation record; class size and injury theory are speculative absent case-specific filings. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-07-23 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Hy Cite Corporationsource ↗ filed by Consumer Attorneys PLLC · Judge Kyle C. Dudek · No. 2:26-cv-02226 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-23 | |
| TRANS UNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by Vullings Law Group, LLC · Judge Gail a. Weilheimer · No. 2:26-cv-05155 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements –$7.40M ▾Minano v. DLJ Mortgage shows most FCRA furnisher/reporting claims dismissed (no private right of action) but often without prejudice, while Askins v. CRST held bare statutory violations confer standing, cutting toward survival on threshold issues. Split outcomes across CRA-adjacent cases signal a real but uncertain path past dismissal. Comparable settlements –$7.40M median $2.23M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · RentGrow $2.25M · Equifax $2.20M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — nearly identical FCRA theory dismissed most counts for private-right-of-action and pleading defects, the closest doctrinal analog here. Main risk: Dismissal of core FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient factual specificity, as in Minano. This defendant: Two other pending FCRA filings against Trans Union (Ho, Cobbs) suggest recurring exposure/litigation pattern, not yet resolved. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $225K–$33.75M Small, heterogeneous comparable set; no FCRA-specific verdicts; class size and per-member figures are broad estimates pending discovery on scope of alleged violation. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-07-23 | –$7.40M comparable settlements |
| CYRsource ↗ No. 1:26-cv-00722 · 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud | Filing | False Advertising | M.D.N.C. | 2026-07-23 | |
| Atrium Healthsource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-23 | ||
| C-Plant Federal Credit Unionsource ↗ | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Call-On-Docsource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Equifaxsource ↗ | Settlement | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Johnson & Wales Universitysource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-23 | $1K | |
| Legends Hospitalitysource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-23 | $5K | |
| Drug and Alcohol Treatment Services (DATS)source ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-23 | $5K | |
| Duke University Health System, Inc.source ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina | 2026-07-23 | |
| Olaplex, Inc.source ↗ common fund · defense: Willkie Farr and Gallagher LLP, Morgan Lewis and Bockius LLP, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory and Natsis LLP · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | California Superior Court (Case No. 37-2024-00018492) | 2026-07-23 | $47.50M |
| Delta Dentalsource ↗ | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-07-23 | ||
| American National Bank & Trustsource ↗ defense: Kirkland and Ellis LLP, McGuireWoods LLP, Loeb and Loeb LLP, Debevoise and Plimpton LLP · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | District Court, C.D. California | 2026-07-23 |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.