← Daily briefing  ·  What cases settle for →

Consumer-Law Records

A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.

Clear

4,069 records · $108.68B in settlements

Defendant / matterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue / comps
Disney YouTube TV & DirecTV Streamsource ↗SettlementFees & Auto-Renewal2026-09-03
Fashion Novasource ↗FilingState-court filings (notable)Washington State Court2026-09-03
Flo Healthsource ↗SettlementPrivacy & Wiretap2026-09-03
Call-On-Docsource ↗
claims-made
SettlementPrivacy & Wiretap2026-09-03
Henderson & Walton Women's Centersource ↗
common fund
SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03
VSLsource ↗
common fund · ~$800/member · No. 8:19-cv-02173-LKG
SettlementFalse Advertising8:19-cv-02173-LKG2026-09-03$20M
Managed Care of North Americasource ↗SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03$2K
Sansone Groupsource ↗SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03$4K
North Cottage Programsource ↗
claims-made
SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03$700K
AOD Federal Credit Unionsource ↗
common fund
SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03$750K
FMC Servicessource ↗
common fund
SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03$2.15M
Highlands Oncology Groupsource ↗SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03$4K
Liberty Media / Las Vegas Grand Prix, Inc.source ↗
common fund
SettlementFees & Auto-RenewalUnited States District Court for the District of Nevada2026-09-03$3.05M
State Farmsource ↗SettlementFees & Auto-RenewalLouisiana2026-09-03
KYB Americassource ↗
common fund
SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03$250K
E. Mishan & Sonssource ↗SettlementFalse Advertising2026-09-03
Peoples Security Bank & Trustsource ↗
common fund
SettlementFees & Auto-RenewalPennsylvania2026-09-03$1.15M
Cone Healthsource ↗
common fund
SettlementPrivacy & Wiretap2026-09-03$1.77M
Community Connections Inc.source ↗SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03
Community Realty Managementsource ↗SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03
NJ Lenders Corp.source ↗SettlementData Breach & Security2026-09-03
Davison Design & Developmentsource ↗
common fund · ~480 members · Pro rata payment /member · No. 2:25-cv-459 · view case timeline →
SettlementRobocalls & Texts (TCPA)Washington2026-09-03$30M
FitOn, Inc.source ↗
common fund · class counsel: Bursor & Fisher, P.A. · No. Index No. 542301/2025
SettlementPrivacy & WiretapSupreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings2026-09-03$2.50M
Fanaticssource ↗SettlementFalse Advertising2026-09-03
Flo, Google, Flurrysource ↗
common fund · Varies based on number of valid claims submitted; California subclass members receive double the share of non-California residents /member
SettlementPrivacy & WiretapU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division2026-09-03$59.50M
The Washington Postsource ↗FilingState-court filings (notable)D.C. Superior Court2026-09-03
Vermont fertility doctorsource ↗VerdictData Breach & SecurityVermont2026-09-03$5.25M
Connecticut fertility clinic/providersource ↗VerdictFalse AdvertisingConnecticut Supreme Court2026-09-03$34M
SunTrustsource ↗
common fund · ~463,000 members · Varies /member · No. 10EV010485
SettlementFees & Auto-RenewalState Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia2026-09-03$240M
Atrium Healthsource ↗
common fund
SettlementPrivacy & Wiretap2026-09-02$2.10M
Night USsource ↗
common fund
SettlementFalse Advertising2026-09-02$8.16M
Lyft, Inc.source ↗
Judge Adam B Abelson · No. 1:26-cv-03482 · 28:1332 Diversity-Torts · view case timeline →
FilingPrivacy & WiretapD. Maryland2026-09-02
CHSPSC LLCsource ↗
filed by MAINE EMPLOYEE RIGHTS GROUP · Judge Stacey D. Neumann · No. 2:26-cv-00423 · 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾
{ "outlook": "mixed", "confidence": "low", "rationale": "Healthcare privacy/tracking claims split in comparables: Bayhealth survived confidentiality breach claims while Santoro v. Tower Health and Integris show dismissal or remand risk on similar Meta Pixel/EHR-sharing theories. Outcome likely turns on pleading specificity and whether wiretap/duty-of-confidentiality framing survives Maine's
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
· grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapD. Me.2026-09-02$51.75M–$725M
comparable settlements
THE HESS AGENCY, INC.source ↗
filed by The Gold Law Firm, P.C. · Judge John Michael Gallagher · No. 5:26-cv-06619 · 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age) · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾
{ "outlook": "mixed", "confidence": "low", "rationale": "Comparable privacy/wiretap rulings split: Bayhealth allowed a breach-of-confidentiality claim to survive while Santoro (3rd Cir., same district family) affirmed dismissal of Meta Pixel tracking claims; Integris and Gunnar remain unclear pending factual development, showing outcomes turn heavily on specific tracking mechanics and pleadi
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
· grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapE.D. Pa.2026-09-02$51.75M–$725M
comparable settlements
Meta Platforms, Inc., f/k/a Facebook, Inc.source ↗
filed by Weitz & Luxengerg, PC · No. 4:26-cv-09440 · 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾
Meta Pixel/privacy claims split in comparables: Santoro v. Tower Health dismissed Meta Pixel health-data claim, while Bayhealth survived a breach-of-confidentiality theory and Integris left state privacy claims unclear; Meta's own $725M nationwide privacy settlement shows litigation risk is real but often resolved short of trial.
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
Class (from complaint): District of Columbia consumers who used Meta's social media platforms, including Facebook, and were misled about the safety of those platforms and Meta's fraud
Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) — dismissed similar Meta Pixel privacy theory with prejudice, showing courts often reject fraud/misrepresentation framing absent concrete injury.
Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead concrete injury or actionable misrepresentation, as in Santoro v. Tower Health
This defendant: Meta has prior privacy/wiretap filings (Smith Nelson) and a $725M nationwide settlement, indicating recurring exposure on this theory.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2.40M–$8.75M
Small comparable sample, DC-only class not directly benchmarked; nationwide settlement figures may overstate per-member value for a narrower state-law class. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapN.D. Cal.2026-09-02$51.75M–$725M
comparable settlements
Carhartt, Inc.source ↗
filed by Fink Bressack PLLC · Judge Judith Ellen Levy · No. 2:26-cv-13167 · 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾
Privacy/wiretap claims split on dismissal—Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading stage, while Nuance, Tower Health, and Integris state claims were dismissed or remain unclear. Carhartt's retail tracking exposure resembles pixel/session-replay theories seen in Tower Health and Bayhealth.
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr.: confidentiality claim from tracking tech survived MTD, showing viable path for retail/health-adjacent data-sharing claims.
Main risk: Dismissal on standing/consent grounds as in Nuance (exemption) or Tower Health (pixel claims dismissed for lack of individualized harm)
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3.75M–$52.50M
Small sample of realized per-member data (n=2) and no prior Carhartt litigation history limit precision; actual outcome highly fact-dependent on tracking mechanism used. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapE.D. Mich.2026-09-02$51.75M–$725M
comparable settlements
NextBoat Inc.source ↗
No. 1:26-cv-07537 · 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act · view case timeline →
FilingPrivacy & WiretapS.D.N.Y.2026-09-02
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLCsource ↗
Judge Catherine Henry · No. 5:26-cv-06623 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline →
FilingRobocalls & Texts (TCPA)E.D. Pa.2026-09-02
KSI TRADING CORPORATIONsource ↗
No. 2:26-cv-06624 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline →
FilingRobocalls & Texts (TCPA)E.D. Pa.2026-09-02
American Express National Banksource ↗
filed by Hays Cauley PC · Judge Sheria Akins Clarke · No. 4:26-cv-03808 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾
Privacy/wiretap tracking-tech claims split in comparables: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived MTD, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim and Nuance's biometric claim were dismissed. Outcome hinges on statutory technicalities (consent, exemptions) not yet tested against AmEx's specific facts.
Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality/tracking-tech claim against a financial-type institution survived MTD, showing viability of similar theories against AmEx.
Main risk: Dismissal on statutory exemption grounds (e.g., financial-institution carve-outs) as in Nuance/BIPA §25(c), given AmEx's status as a bank.
This defendant: Prior FCRA/FDCPA filing (Uqdah) suggests AmEx faces recurring consumer-statute exposure across theories.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $7.50M–$225M
Small, heterogeneous comparable set; true class size and specific wiretap conduct (session replay vs. pixel vs. chat) unknown, limiting precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapD.S.C.2026-09-02$51.75M–$725M
comparable settlements
← NewerOlder →
Take this result set with you

Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.

GET /records/export.csv?sort=date&token=…  ·  GET /api/v1/records

Get Records Pro — $99/mo →