E.D. Mich. · No. 2:26-cv-13167
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carhartt, Inc.source ↗ filed by Fink Bressack PLLC · Judge Judith Ellen Levy · No. 2:26-cv-13167 · 28:1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims split on dismissal—Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading stage, while Nuance, Tower Health, and Integris state claims were dismissed or remain unclear. Carhartt's retail tracking exposure resembles pixel/session-replay theories seen in Tower Health and Bayhealth. Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr.: confidentiality claim from tracking tech survived MTD, showing viable path for retail/health-adjacent data-sharing claims. Main risk: Dismissal on standing/consent grounds as in Nuance (exemption) or Tower Health (pixel claims dismissed for lack of individualized harm) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3.75M–$52.50M Small sample of realized per-member data (n=2) and no prior Carhartt litigation history limit precision; actual outcome highly fact-dependent on tracking mechanism used. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Mich. | 2026-09-02 | $51.75M–$725M comparable settlements |