← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
2,720 records · $65.30B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anchor Boatlifts LLC and Jason Millersource ↗ The trial court's summary judgment against James on all her claims is affirmed, and the trial court's denial of Defendants' attorney's fees is also affirmed because the r | Opinion | Warranty & product | Tex. App.-Beaumont | 2026-05-07 | affirmed |
| Igloo Products Corp.source ↗ The Ninth Circuit held that Lanham Act §1125(a)(1)(B) protects only observable, tangible characteristics of a product, so a claim based on who was 'first to market' an id | Opinion | State UCL / CLRA (California) | 9th Cir. | 2026-05-06 | affirmed |
| Carlsource ↗ The Appellate Division affirmed the grant of summary judgment, striking of defendants' answer/counterclaims, and confirmation of the referee's report because the record s | Opinion | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | N.Y. App. Div. | 2026-05-06 | modified; affirmed as modified |
| Penske Media Corporationsource ↗ No. 2:25-cv-05803 | Settlement | False Advertising | United States District Court for the Central District of California | 2026-05-05 | |
| Harbor Rail Services of California, Inc.source ↗ The court held that Vela, a rail freight car repairman who did not transport goods or work while goods were in transit, does not fall within the FAA's §1 exemption for tr | Opinion | State UCL / CLRA (California) | Cal. Ct. App. | 2026-05-01 | affirmed in part, dismissed in part, writ denied |
| Zeus Networks, LLCsource ↗ The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Zeus's motion to compel arbitration, holding that the small, gray, hyperlinked 'Terms of Service' text placed | Opinion | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 11th Cir. | 2026-05-01 | affirmed |
| SB&C, Ltd.source ↗ The Washington Supreme Court held that the charity care notice requirements of RCW 70.170.060(8)(a) apply to collection agencies collecting on hospital debt, not just hos | Opinion | Debt collection & servicing | Wash. | 2026-04-30 | certified question answered yes |
| RRA CP Opportunity Tr. 1source ↗ The court held that a HELOC agreement, because it does not state a fixed amount actually advanced, is not a negotiable instrument under RCW 62A.3-104(a), and because one | Opinion | Debt collection & servicing | Wash. | 2026-04-30 | certified questions answered for plaintiff |
| Temusource ↗ | Filing | State-court filings (notable) | Los Angeles County Superior Court | 2026-04-28 | |
| Madgicsource ↗ The trial court erred in applying the one-year penal statute of limitations (§ 52-585) to the defendants' UCC Article 9 and RISFA counterclaims because those claims are t | Opinion | Warranty & product | Conn. | 2026-04-28 | reversed and remanded |
| General Electric Co.source ↗ The Supreme Court of Maryland held that a household member who alleges asbestos exposure through no fault of their own from dust brought home on a worker's clothing need | Opinion | Warranty & product | Md. | 2026-04-27 | Certified question answered no |
| Zillowsource ↗ | Filing | State-court filings (notable) | Superior Court of Washington, D.C. | 2026-04-25 | |
| Rite Aid Corporationsource ↗ | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-04-23 | ||
| Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC.source ↗ The court denied Defendant's motion to compel arbitration because Plaintiff's box-office ticket purchase claim did not arise out of or relate to her use of Defendant's di | Opinion | Fees & Auto-Renewal | D.D.C. | 2026-04-23 | MTD granted in part |
| Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Companysource ↗ ~87K members | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-04-22 | ||
| Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motorssource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Product Liability | 2026-04-21 | $9M | |
| Hyundai Motor America and Kia Motorssource ↗ common fund · No. 8:22-ml-03052-JVS-KES | Settlement | Product Liability | C.D. Cal. | 2026-04-21 | $145M |
| The Kroger Co.source ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court (Ohio) | 2026-04-21 | $17M |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Companysource ↗ common fund · ~37K members · ≈$421.62/member gross · class counsel: Carney Bates & Pulliam PLLC, Normand PLLC, Jacobson Phillips PLLC · No. 4:21-cv-01161 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas | 2026-04-21 | $15.60M |
| Galderma (Differin Acne Product)source ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-04-21 | $990K | |
| Nutramax Laboratories (Cosequin Dog Supplements)source ↗ | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-04-21 | ||
| Beef industry defendantssource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-04-21 | $87.50M | |
| Allergan (RevitaLash Conditioner)source ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-04-21 | $4.17M | |
| Whirlpool Corporationsource ↗ class counsel: Chimicles Schwartz Kriner & Donaldson-Smith LLP · No. 1:24-cv-00188 | Settlement | Product Liability | U.S. District Court, District of Delaware | 2026-04-21 | |
| Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.source ↗ common fund · class counsel: Chant Yedalian, Chant & Company, A Professional Law Corporation, Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman · No. 22STCV26572 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles | 2026-04-21 | $5M |
| Avis Rent A Car System, LLCsource ↗ claims-made · class counsel: Emery Reddy PLLC, Edelson Lechtzin LLP, Lynch Carpenter LLP · No. 2:24-cv-09243 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey | 2026-04-21 | |
| Financial Builders Federal Credit Unionsource ↗ The Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of Haskins' overdraft-fees breach of contract claim because it constitutes an action upon a deposit account subject to the two-yea | Opinion | Lending & fees | Ind. Ct. App. | 2026-04-20 | affirmed |
| Target Corporationsource ↗ The Ninth Circuit held that the district court misapplied Moore v. Trader Joe's by dismissing the complaint solely because an 800 thread count claim was physically imposs | Opinion | State UCL / CLRA (California) | 9th Cir. | 2026-04-17 | reversed and remanded |
| the Brita Products Companysource ↗ The Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal because no reasonable consumer would expect Brita's water filters to reduce common hazardous contaminants to below lab-detectable lev | Opinion | Warranty & product | 9th Cir. | 2026-04-16 | affirmed |
| Bank of America, N.A.source ↗ The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Bank of America, holding that IEEPA's liability shield protects the Bank's citizenship-based Consumer Residency Monitoring | Opinion | State UCL / CLRA (California) | 9th Cir. | 2026-04-13 | affirmed |
| Meta Platforms, Inc.source ↗ The Supreme Judicial Court held that Section 230(c)(1) does not immunize Meta from the Commonwealth's claims because they target Meta's own conduct as a product designer | Opinion | State UCL / CLRA (California) | Mass. | 2026-04-10 | MTD denial affirmed |
| Scott Wincklersource ↗ The Fifth DCA affirmed the judgment against Suzuki, holding that a defense verdict on the strict liability design defect claim did not preclude Winckler from proceeding o | Opinion | Warranty & product | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2026-04-10 | affirmed |
| District of Columbiasource ↗ Because Ms. Moore voluntarily dismissed her remaining claims against private contractor defendants without prejudice rather than with prejudice or seeking Rule 54(b) cert | Opinion | Data Breach & Security | D.C. | 2026-04-02 | appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction |
| SPARC Group LLCsource ↗ The Washington Supreme Court held that a consumer does not suffer a cognizable injury to 'business or property' under the CPA when she purchases and retains the exact fun | Opinion | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Wash. | 2026-04-02 | certified question answered no |
| Verizon Wireless Services LLCsource ↗ class counsel: Esenstein Law · No. 2:15-cv-00191 | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California | 2026-04-01 | |
| Nordstrom, Inc.source ↗ The court held that Nordstrom's incident report is not protected work product because it was created in the ordinary course of business rather than because of anticipated | Opinion | Data Breach & Security | D.D.C. | 2026-04-01 | Motion to compel granted |
| Teslasource ↗ The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's grant of nonsuit because the consumer expectations test applies only where ordinary consumers' everyday experience creates | Opinion | Warranty & product | Cal. Ct. App. | 2026-04-01 | affirmed |
| Ricoh U.S.A., Inc.source ↗ The Court affirmed that an omission-based claim under the UTPCPL's catch-all provision requires the seller to have had an affirmative legal duty to disclose the omitted i | Opinion | Warranty & product | Pa. | 2026-03-31 | affirmed |
| Sunrun Inc., Clean Energy Experts LLCsource ↗ common fund · class counsel: Parisi & Havens LLP, Parasmo Lieberman · No. 4:15-cv-05340 | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-03-30 | $5.50M |
| GameSpotsource ↗ common fund | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | 2026-03-28 | $1.20M |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.