← Daily briefing · What cases settle for →
A searchable database of consumer-protection filings, settlements, and opinions — built by Public Vector's agents and growing every day. Filter by type, practice area, or defendant; sort settlements by value.
2,720 records · $65.30B in settlements
| Defendant / matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value / comps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nationwide Pet Insurancesource ↗ ~$18/member · No. 2022-022187-CA-01 | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida | 2026-07-18 | |
| Bayersource ↗ | Settlement | Product Liability | 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri | 2026-07-18 | |
| Michael Korssource ↗ common fund · ~$30/member · class counsel: Kopelowitz Ostrow P.A., Edelsberg Law, Kaliel Gold PLLC, Tycko & Zavareei LLP · defense: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (NY) · No. 25CU041352N · view case timeline → | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Superior Court of California, County of San Diego | 2026-07-18 | $4.88M |
| Nelnet Servicingsource ↗ common fund · ~2,501,324 members · ≈$4/member gross · class counsel: SILVER, GOLUB LAW FIRM, LOWEY DANNENBERG LAW FIRM - NY · defense: BAKER, HOSTETLER LAW FIRM - DENVER · No. 4:22-cv-3191; 5:23-cv-00099-R · view case timeline → | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska; U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma | 2026-07-18 | $10M |
| Allina Healthsource ↗ common fund · ~2,500,000 members · pro rata share /member · No. 0:24-cv-03674-SRN-ECW | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota | 2026-07-18 | $12.50M |
| Flosource ↗ common fund · Varies /member · No. 3:21-cv-00757 | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-07-18 | $59.50M |
| Gametimesource ↗ $5 and up /member · No. CGC-22-599227 | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | Los Angeles County Superior Court | 2026-07-18 | |
| Menardsource ↗ No. 2416-cv-06275 | Settlement | Product Liability | Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri | 2026-07-18 | |
| Tom's of Mainesource ↗ up to three products (cash refund) /member · class counsel: Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah LLC, Reese, LLP, Halunen Law, Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah · defense: Latham & Watkins, Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Latham & Watkins, LLP · No. 2:25-cv-06996-JMW · view case timeline → | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York | 2026-07-18 | |
| Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.source ↗ Judge Vernon Speede Broderick · No. 1:26-cv-06089 · 28:1331at Fed. Question: Anti-trust | Filing | Antitrust / Price-Fixing | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-07-17 | |
| University of Daytonsource ↗ Judge Thomas M. Rose · No. 3:26-cv-00253 · 29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap) | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Ohio | 2026-07-17 | |
| Pierresource ↗ filed by So Cal Equal Access Group · No. 2:26-cv-07843 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-07-17 | |
| Gatorade Co.source ↗ The Second Circuit deferred decision and certified two unsettled questions of New York law to the New York Court of Appeals—whether the economic loss doctrine bars tort c · view case timeline → | Opinion | State statutes — FL / TX / GA | 2d Cir. | 2026-07-17 | certified questions to NY Court of Appeals |
| MII Brand Import, LLCsource ↗ Judge Franklin Ulyses Valderrama · No. 1:26-cv-08502 · 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ill. | 2026-07-17 | |
| BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.source ↗ filed by Read Legal LLC · No. 2:26-cv-04987 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act Comparable settlements $2.20M–$7.40M ▾Comparables split: Fraase and Wallingford favored furnishers/creditors, while Wright and partial Minano rulings show consumer claims can survive pleading stage. Minano (FCRA furnisher claim) is most analogous and shows courts often trim claims without full dismissal. Comparable settlements $2.20M–$7.40M median $3.62M · n=4 Trader Joe's $7.40M · Sprouts $5M · RentGrow $2.25M Per member (realized): ~$102 median · $102–$102 (n=1) Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — nearly identical FCRA furnisher theory, MTD granted in part but some claims survived without prejudice. Main risk: No private right of action for several FCRA subsections, as in Minano, could gut core claims early. This defendant: BofA has settled prior consumer claims ($32M TCPA, $2.2M fees), showing willingness to settle rather than litigate to verdict. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.75M–$52.50M Single realized per-member data point (n=1) and no direct BofA FCRA verdicts; wide EV range reflects uncertain class definition and survival odds. · grounded in 10 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-07-17 | $2.20M–$7.40M comparable settlements |
| Toyotasource ↗ filed by Pacific Trial Attorneys | Filing | State-court filings (notable) | Los Angeles County Superior Court | 2026-07-16 | |
| Extra Space Storagesource ↗ The court affirmed dismissal because Crockett failed to adequately brief or substantively challenge the trial court's Rule 91a dismissal and summary judgment grounds, and · view case timeline → | Opinion | State statutes — FL / TX / GA | Tex. App.-Austin | 2026-07-16 | Affirmed |
| Toyotasource ↗ filed by Pacific Trial Attorneys | Filing | State-court filings (notable) | Los Angeles County Superior Court | 2026-07-16 | |
| Wi-LAN Inc.source ↗ No. 1:26-mc-01965 · Motion to Compel | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | W.D. Tex. | 2026-07-16 | |
| Nixon Peabody LLPsource ↗ filed by Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP · Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings · No. 1:26-cv-08471 · 28:1331 Federal Question Comparable settlements $12.67M–$68M ▾Comparable rulings split: Bayhealth allowed a confidentiality claim to survive while Integris and LabCorp show dismissal or unclear outcomes on data-sharing theories; Clements shows appellate courts remanding rather than resolving BIPA-type claims outright. Comparable settlements $12.67M–$68M median $38.75M · n=10 Google $68M · Flo $59.50M · Flo, Google, and F $59.50M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $30–$30 (n=1) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — shows privacy/confidentiality claims against institutional defendants can survive MTD when duty of confidentiality is plausibly alleged. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show actionable disclosure or standing, as in Integris where 'acting under' federal theory failed and state claims remained unclear Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $150K–$7.50M Single realized data point ($30) limits reliability; law firm defendant differs from tech/health comparables, so settlement dynamics may diverge. · grounded in 5 rulings, 10 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ill. | 2026-07-16 | $12.67M–$68M comparable settlements |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONsource ↗ filed by Rkw Law Group · No. 1:26-cv-02494 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-07-16 | |
| Columbia Brands Usa, LLCsource ↗ filed by Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA · Judge Julie Sneed · No. 6:26-cv-01536 · Americans with Disabilities Act Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits typically yield injunctive relief plus fee-shifting, as in Price v. Diab where prevailing-party fees were affirmed on remand; no disparate-impact analog here limits precedent value. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms ADA plaintiffs obtaining injunctive relief qualify as prevailing parties entitled to fees, even via default. Main risk: Standing/mootness challenges if defendant remediates access barrier before judgment, per common ADA Title III dismissal pattern Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$12K Small, non-analogous comparable set; ADA Title III lacks damages class mechanics, limiting EV framework accuracy. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-16 | $2K–$12K rough EV |
| Dollar Treesource ↗ Judge Wendy Williams Berger · No. 3:26-cv-01819 · 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age) | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-07-16 | |
| American Honda Motor Co., Inc.source ↗ filed by Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC · No. 2:26-cv-07823 · 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) Comparable settlements $11.50M–$425M ▾False advertising claims show mixed outcomes: KetoNatural survived in part on literal falsity but affiliate statements dismissed, while Guthrie affirmed denial of certification due to individualized reliance issues. Honda's turbo-engine claims likely face similar predominance and falsity-proof hurdles. Comparable settlements $11.50M–$425M median $67M · n=10 Capital One $425M · IM Mastery Academy $90M · Premier Nutrition $90M Per member (realized): ~$147 median · $20–$150 (n=4) Class (from complaint): Owners or lessees of 2018-2022 Honda Accords, 2016-2022 Honda Civics, and 2017-2022 Honda CR-Vs equipped with the 1.5-liter i-VTEC turbocharged gasoline direct Key precedent: KetoNatural v. Hill's Pet Nutrition - shows literal-falsity claims can survive 12(b)(6) even when broader theories fail, a plausible path for Honda plaintiffs. Main risk: Certification denial for individualized reliance/communications, as in Guthrie v. Transamerica, could collapse class-wide damages theory. This defendant: Honda has settled prior product liability and fee-related consumer claims, suggesting willingness to settle rather than litigate to verdict. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $37.50M–$300M Small comparable sample and wide class-size uncertainty (turbo-equipped subset unknown) limit precision; figures are illustrative ranges only. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | False Advertising | C.D. Cal. | 2026-07-16 | $11.50M–$425M comparable settlements |
| META PLATFORMS, INC.source ↗ filed by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP · No. 1:26-cv-02493 · 42:1396 - Tort Negligence Comparable settlements $12.67M–$68M ▾Comparable rulings split on threshold issues: Gunnar Optiks shows dismissal is often premature on factual notice/consent questions, while Bayhealth shows confidentiality/tracking claims can survive MTD; Integris shows some state privacy claims against Meta co-defendants remain unclear post-removal. Comparable settlements $12.67M–$68M median $38.75M · n=10 Google $68M · Flo $59.50M · Flo, Google, and F $59.50M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $30–$30 (n=1) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M Key precedent: Doe v. Integris Health (10th Cir.) — directly involves Facebook/Google tracking-tech disclosure claims, mirroring Meta's wiretap exposure. Main risk: Motion to dismiss on consent/technical-interception grounds, as seen in mixed outcomes across Gunnar and Integris rulings This defendant: Meta has faced and lost prior MTD bids (Commonwealth v. Meta UCL/CLRA), suggesting persistent litigation exposure pattern Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $800M–$7.50B Small comparable sample (n=10 settlements, 5 rulings); EV scales enormously with Meta's massive class size vs. typical litigant, so realistic settlement likely far below computed EV ceiling. · grounded in 5 rulings, 10 settlements, 1 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.D.C. | 2026-07-16 | $12.67M–$68M comparable settlements |
| Nutricostsource ↗ ~$20/member · No. 2:23-cv-06387(NJC)(AYS) | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York | 2026-07-16 | |
| Serviceaidesource ↗ ~480,000 members · up to $5,000 /member · No. 625615/2025 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Google Playsource ↗ No. 3:20-cv-05792-JD | Settlement | Privacy & Wiretap | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California | 2026-07-16 | |
| Labcorp AMCAsource ↗ No. 19-md-2904 | Settlement | Data Breach & Security | United States District Court for the District of New Jersey | 2026-07-16 | |
| Generac Power Systems Inc.source ↗ common fund · class counsel: Reese LLP, Sultzer & Lipari PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-05559 | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois | 2026-07-15 | $15M |
| Cove Surf Co. Inc. (doing business as Cove USA)source ↗ class counsel: Almeida Law Group LLC, Jennings & Earley PLLC · No. 8:26-cv-00789 | Settlement | False Advertising | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California | 2026-07-15 | |
| Yellowstone Capitalsource ↗ common fund · ~4K members · ≈$146.05/member gross | Settlement | Fees & Auto-Renewal | 2026-07-15 | $549K | |
| Golden Home Servicessource ↗ common fund | Settlement | False Advertising | California | 2026-07-15 | $2.80M |
| American Financial Benefits Centersource ↗ | Settlement | False Advertising | 2026-07-15 | ||
| American Vehicle Protectionsource ↗ common fund · ~9K members · ≈$20.50/member gross | Settlement | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | 2026-07-15 | $186K | |
| Zurixxsource ↗ common fund · ~20K members · ≈$91.17/member gross | Settlement | False Advertising | Utah | 2026-07-15 | $1.80M |
| Erskinesource ↗ The Ninth Circuit held that the public disclosure bar did not preclude Relator's FCA claim because the information pleaded was not substantially the same as that disclose | Opinion | Debt collection & servicing | 9th Cir. | 2026-07-15 | Reversed and remanded |
| Shenzhen Lepower International Electronics Co. Ltd.source ↗ filed by Grotefeld, Hoffmann, Schleiter, Gordon & Ochoa, LLP · Judge Virginia Mary Kendall · No. 1:26-cv-08345 · 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability Comparable settlements $925K–$145M ▾No rulings exist yet for product liability against this defendant or close analogs; settlement data (n=7) is dominated by mega-recalls (Kia/Hyundai) not comparable to a small component supplier. Closest scale analog is Hydrafacial Syndeo ($0.9M), suggesting modest exposure absent a mass-injury profile. Comparable settlements $925K–$145M median $5.50M · n=7 Kia Hyundai $145M · Hyundai/Kia $62.10M · Chantix $44M Per member (realized): ~$40 median · $25–$4,500 (n=3) Key precedent: Hydrafacial Syndeo Device ($0.9M settlement) — closest analog for a niche electronics/device product liability claim with limited class size. Main risk: Product liability claims against small foreign suppliers often stall on causation/defect proof or personal jurisdiction, unlike branded recalls (Kia/Hyundai) with clear defect records. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $56K–$2.25M No direct rulings or defendant history exist; estimate relies on weak analogs and generic survival assumptions — treat as highly speculative. · grounded in 0 rulings, 7 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Product Liability | N.D. Ill. | 2026-07-15 | $925K–$145M comparable settlements |
| Oshkosh Corporationsource ↗ Judge William C. Griesbach · No. 2:26-cv-01198 · 15:15 Antitrust Litigation | Filing | Antitrust / Price-Fixing | E.D. Wis. | 2026-07-15 | |
| The City of Daphnesource ↗ Judge Kristi DuBose · No. 1:26-cv-00254 · 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D. Ala. | 2026-07-15 |
Subscribers export any search as CSV or pull it through the JSON API — defendant, court, practice area, settlement value and per-member comps included.