M.D. Fla. · No. 2:26-cv-03008
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG Administration LLCsource ↗ filed by Richard Celler Legal PA · No. 2:26-cv-03008 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Courts split sharply on tracking-tech/wiretap theories: Eyemart Express and Gunnar Optiks survived pleading-stage motions on similar disclosure/consent theories, while Tower Health and Nuance were dismissed on comparable facts. Outcome is highly fact-dependent on consent language and whether data qualifies as protected health/biometric info. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Rand v. Eyemart Express (5th Cir.) - survived because plaintiffs plausibly alleged disclosure of individually identifiable data via tracking pixel without consent, a close factual analog. Main risk: Dismissal on statutory exemption or lack of interception/consent grounds, as in Nuance (GLBA exemption) and Tower Health (pleading deficiencies) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1M–$25M Defendant identity and class size highly uncertain from noisy web signals; estimate is speculative and should be revised once actual defendant business/data scope is confirmed · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-11-05 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |