S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-09692
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Management Group, Inc.source ↗ filed by Law Offices of Jared M. Lefkowitz · No. 1:26-cv-09692 · 26:7434 IRS: Civil Damages for Fraudulent Filing of Information · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims show split outcomes: Rand v. Eyemart and Bayhealth survived on data-sharing/confidentiality theories, while Tower Health and Cisneros were dismissed on causation/exemption grounds. Outcome likely turns on specificity of alleged disclosure mechanism and identifiability of data shared. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Rand v. Eyemart Express (5th Cir.) - survived because plaintiffs specifically pled individually identifiable health info disclosed via tracking pixel without consent, a likely template claim here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead individually identifiable disclosure or lack of duty, as in Tower Health and Cisneros (statutory exemption/causation defects) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $25K–$3.62M Defendant identity is ambiguous across web sources (multiple similarly-named entities); class size and settlement capacity are speculative absent confirmed business scale or prior litigation history. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-11-05 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |