N.D. Ga. · No. 4:26-cv-00338
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Health Care System, Inc.source ↗ filed by Don Bivens, PLLC · Judge William M. Ray II · No. 4:26-cv-00338 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Pixel/tracking privacy claims split evenly in comparables: Doe v. Bayhealth and Rand v. Eyemart survived MTD, while Santoro v. Tower Health and Nuance were dismissed on exemption/standing grounds. Outcome likely turns on specific tracking technology and consent language, not yet clear here. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $115M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Apple $250M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Rand v. Eyemart Express (5th Cir.) — survived because Meta Pixel disclosure of IIHI was adequately pled, closely mirrors likely Hamilton facts if pixel-based. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of actionable disclosure or exemption, as in Santoro v. Tower Health (Meta Pixel claim dismissed with prejudice) and Nuance (statutory exemption) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $200K–$4M Small, ambiguous web signals on true class size/defendant scale; realized per-member benchmark based on only 2 data points limits precision. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | N.D. Ga. | 2026-11-04 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |