M.D. Fla. · No. 2:26-cv-02991
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A & M Properties of The GulfCoast Incsource ↗ filed by The Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A. · No. 2:26-cv-02991 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows ADA access claims can be dismissed if plaintiff fails to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirms ADA claims can survive at summary judgment; outcome is fact-dependent on barrier specificity. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Thurn v. A&M Properties of the Gulfcoast Inc — same defendant, same theory, signals repeat ADA exposure and possible serial-filer pattern. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show concrete, imminent barrier or standing deficiency, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmance This defendant: Second ADA accessibility suit against this defendant (Thurn case) suggests recurring compliance issues or repeat-plaintiff targeting. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$112K Small sample, no direct verdicts, and settlement comparables involve much larger defendants, limiting precision. · grounded in 9 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-11-04 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |