E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-08461
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUTRISYSTEM, INC.source ↗ filed by KOLLER LAW PC · No. 2:26-cv-08461 · 28:451 Employment Discrimination · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Tower Health (3rd Cir., same circuit as E.D. Pa.) dismissed nearly identical Meta Pixel/health-data disclosure claims, while Eyemart Express and Bayhealth allowed similar tracking-tech privacy claims to survive. Outcome likely turns on pleading specificity re: individually identifiable health information disclosure. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health (3rd Cir.) — binding circuit precedent dismissing Meta Pixel health-data privacy claims, directly on point for E.D. Pa. court. Main risk: 3rd Circuit precedent (Tower Health) dismissing nearly identical pixel-tracking health-privacy claims could control in E.D. Pa. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.16M–$23.20M Small/uncertain precedent sample, no confirmed class size or defendant-specific settlement data; estimate highly speculative. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-11-04 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |