Simone v. Servis One, Inc.

M.D. Fla. · No. 2:26-cv-02981

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

Matter	Type	Practice area	Court	Date	Value
Servis One, Inc.source ↗ filed by Newhart Legal, P.A. · Judge Kyle C. Dudek · No. 2:26-cv-02981 · Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾ Comparable privacy/wiretap rulings split roughly evenly: Rand v. Eyemart and Doe v. Bayhealth allowed similar disclosure claims to survive, while Santoro v. Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance affirmed dismissal of analogous tracking/biometric theories. Small-company defendants with no prior wiretap exposure add uncertainty to outcome prediction. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Tamirie v. Servis One (MTD granted, debt servicing) shows this defendant has successfully dismissed prior consumer claims, suggesting similar litigation posture here. Main risk: Rand v. Eyemart Express shows wiretap/IIHI disclosure claims via tracking tech can survive dismissal, creating exposure risk even for smaller servicers This defendant: Prior MTD granted in Tamirie v. Servis One signals pattern of successful early dismissals in debt-servicing consumer suits. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $580K–$125M Tiny per-member benchmark sample (n=2) and unknown exact class size make this a wide, low-confidence estimate; actual servicer customer base not publicly confirmed. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts	Filing	Privacy & Wiretap	M.D. Fla.	2026-11-04	$59.50M–$725M comparable settlements