S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-09642
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protect Animals With Satellites LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-09642 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾Comparable ADA accessibility rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax (8th Cir.) affirmed ADA violations; Billesdon shows accommodation claims often fail even as related claims survive. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) - same circuit as S.D.N.Y., shows plaintiffs bear burden of proving reasonable/effective accommodation, a common failure point. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to establish standing/effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmed by 2nd Circuit. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$250K Small sample, no prior records on this defendant, and class size is speculative given limited web presence and likely single-plaintiff ADA tester structure. · grounded in 9 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-11-04 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |