S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-09636
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cho Familia Dynastia, Inc.source ↗ filed by The Weitz Law Firm, P.A. · Judge Katherine Polk Failla · No. 1:26-cv-09636 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows courts require plaintiffs to prove modifications are effective, risking dismissal, while Price v. Diab shows default/injunctive relief cases often proceed with fee awards. Billesdon illustrates mixed outcomes on ADA accommodation claims even when some claims survive. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - same circuit, shows ADA accessibility claims can fail if plaintiff doesn't prove effective remedy; relevant to S.D.N.Y. restaurant case. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show standing/injury-in-fact or ineffective proposed modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$25K Likely single-plaintiff accessibility suit, not class action; small defendant size limits settlement scale versus larger comparables; data sparse. · grounded in 9 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-11-03 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |