E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-08405
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLCsource ↗ filed by HAUSFELD LLP · No. 2:26-cv-08405 · 28:1332(d)(5)(B) Diversity of Citizenship under CAFA · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾{
"outlook": "mixed",
"confidence": "low",
"rationale": "Comparable tracking-tech privacy rulings split evenly: Rand v. Eyemart and Doe v. Bayhealth let IIHI-disclosure claims survive, while Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance were dismissed on pixel/BIPA exemption grounds. Outcome hinges on whether Frontline's data flows are deemed 'health' or 'biometric' info triggering statutory protectio Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-11-03 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |