D.D.C. · No. 1:26-cv-03872
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRANS UNION, LLCsource ↗ filed by THE WASHINGTON LEGAL GROUP, LLC · Judge Amit Priyavadan Mehta · No. 1:26-cv-03872 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $2.45M–$100M ▾Comparable FCRA rulings split: Minano v. DLJ shows courts frequently dismiss FCRA furnisher claims for lack of private right of action, while Askins shows bare statutory violations can satisfy standing. TransUnion has multiple concurrent individual FCRA filings in this district, suggesting repeat low-dollar litigation rather than class treatment. Comparable settlements $2.45M–$100M median $7.86M · n=10 Equifax $100M · Equifax $30M · Equifax Informatio $30M Per member (realized): ~$176 median · $25–$250 (n=4) Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital (D.D.C.) - shows D.D.C. readily dismisses FCRA claims lacking private right of action or factual specificity, a likely early hurdle here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead concrete injury or insufficient factual detail, mirroring Minano's partial dismissal of FCRA furnisher claims. This defendant: TransUnion faces a recurring pattern of individual FCRA filings in D.D.C. (Cobbs, HO, OUT, LISMAN, JOHNSON, CHAS), suggesting routine but low-value litigation. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$5K Treated as individual action absent class allegations; EV differs sharply if later certified as a class given $2.5M-$100M historical TransUnion settlements. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Consumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA) | D.D.C. | 2026-11-03 | $2.45M–$100M comparable settlements |