M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-03320
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTENE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCsource ↗ filed by Imler Law · No. 8:26-cv-03320 · 28:451 Employment Discrimination · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾{
"outlook": "uncertain",
"confidence": "low",
"rationale": "The complaint alleges denial of Hepatitis C drug coverage, not classic privacy/wiretap data-sharing — a mismatch with the labeled theory and comparables like Rand v. Eyemart and Doe v. Bayhealth, which involve Meta Pixel/health-data disclosure, not coverage denial. Survival odds for true privacy claims are mixed (e.g., Santoro v. T Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Class (from complaint): M.D., C.F., and E.M., individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons who purchased health insurance policies from Centene subsidiaries and · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-31 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |