M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-02561
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAPE CAFE, INCsource ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 6:26-cv-02561 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft shows plaintiffs must prove modification effectiveness or claims fail, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed multiple ADA counts. Price v. Diab shows even default/injunctive wins can lose fee entitlement on appeal, limiting recovery certainty. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — affirmed dismissal where plaintiff failed to show requested accommodation was reasonable/effective, a common defense for small accessibility defendants. Main risk: Single small vape shop likely faces individual tester suit seeking injunctive relief only; Title III bars damages, so exposure is mainly attorney's fees, risk of fee denial per Price v. Diab. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$75K Small sample, no direct small-business ADA settlement comparables; corporate settlement benchmarks likely overstate exposure for a single-location defendant. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-10-31 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |