W.D. Tex. · No. 7:26-cv-00440
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc.source ↗ filed by Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP · Judge Walter David Counts III · No. 7:26-cv-00440 · 35:271 Patent Infringement · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split roughly evenly—Rand v. Eyemart and Doe v. Bayhealth allowed tracking/disclosure claims to survive, while Santoro v. Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance dismissed similar Pixel/biometric theories; Apple's claim mixes false-advertising allegations with a privacy label, adding pleading risk. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Class (from complaint): Individuals who purchased iPhone 16 devices in reliance on Apple's false and misleading representations regarding Apple Intelligence and enhanced Siri capabilit Key precedent: Rand v. Eyemart Express (5th Cir.) — closest factual analog on tech-enabled data disclosure surviving a motion to dismiss. Main risk: Claim conflates false-advertising theory (Apple Intelligence/Siri marketing) with wiretap label, risking dismissal like Santoro v. Tower Health for failure to plead a cognizable interception/disclosure. This defendant: Apple has multiple concurrent privacy filings (Alvarez, Doe, AWKO Doe) and one prior $95M privacy settlement, showing recurring exposure on this theory. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $20M–$500M Class definition describes false-advertising conduct, not classic wiretap/interception facts, creating theory mismatch that clouds precedent applicability and damages modeling. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | W.D. Tex. | 2026-10-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |