E.D. Mo. · No. 4:26-cv-01884
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stella Environmental Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by SULAIMAN LAW GROUP LTD · Judge Catherine D. Perry · No. 4:26-cv-01884 · 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Pixel/tracking-based privacy claims show split outcomes: Rand v. Eyemart Express and Doe v. Bayhealth survived, while Santoro v. Tower Health and Walker v. Fidelity were dismissed on pleading deficiencies. Clements v. Gunnar shows courts often defer dismissal pending factual development on data-type/consent issues. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Rand v. Eyemart Express (5th Cir.) — closest factual analog where Meta Pixel disclosure of identifiable data survived MTD, suggesting plausible path if tracking tech is alleged similarly. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead actionable 'content' interception or lack of identifiable health/personal data, as in Santoro v. Tower Health and Walker v. Fidelity. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $6K–$1M Extremely limited defendant-specific data; class size and per-member figures are rough extrapolations from unrelated large-tech settlements, not Stella's actual scale. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Mo. | 2026-10-30 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |