E.D. Pa. · No. 5:26-cv-08324
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWPOH, INC.source ↗ filed by Perrong Law LLC · Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl · No. 5:26-cv-08324 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M ▾TCPA robocall/text claims survive dismissal when calls plausibly used prerecorded/autodialed technology and lack consent, as in League of Women Voters v. Kramer, but narrow definitional carve-outs (Howard v. RNC on prerecorded-voice trigger, Hulce v. Zipongo on 'telephone solicitation') show courts frequently dismiss on technical grounds. Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, LLC $61M · ccAdvertising and Dr $32.42M Key precedent: League of Women Voters v. Kramer (D.N.H.) - MTD denied on near-identical TCPA robocall theory, showing viable path past pleading stage. Main risk: Dismissal on technical TCPA triggers (e.g., no prerecorded-voice opening per Howard v. RNC, or solicitation definition per Hulce v. Zipongo) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $4K–$675K Defendant identity/revenue unclear from web signals; class size and per-member figures are rough estimates given small-company profile and sparse direct data · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-10-30 | $29.50M–$76M comparable settlements |