S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-09502
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speedcubeshop, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-09502 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾ADA web-accessibility suits in S.D.N.Y. often survive initial motions, but Lowell v. Lyft shows dismissal is likely if plaintiff can't prove the requested modification is effective. No ADA-specific prior record for this defendant adds uncertainty. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — affirmed dismissal because plaintiff failed to show proposed accessibility fix would actually work, a common defense for small e-commerce sites. Main risk: Failure to plead a concrete, provably effective accessibility remedy, mirroring the dismissal rationale in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$50K No direct ADA website-accessibility precedent or defendant-specific data; figures are rough analogical estimates, not statute-based damages. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-10-29 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |