← Records

Thurn v. A & M Properties of the Gulfcoast Inc

S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-27700

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
A & M Properties of the Gulfcoast Incsource ↗
filed by The Mineo Salcedo Law Firm, P.A. · No. 1:26-cv-27700 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾
ADA accessibility claims split in comparables: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax and Price v. Diab show ADA claims and injunctive relief can survive/affirm. Small property manager defendants rarely match large-chain settlement benchmarks (Home Depot, Container Store).
Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4
The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K
Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — plaintiff bears burden proving proposed accommodation is effective, a common dismissal basis for ADA accessibility suits.
Main risk: Dismissal for lack of standing/mootness if barriers remediated, as seen in Burton (mootness fight) and Lowell (failure to prove reasonable modification)
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$100K
No prior defendant history, no verdict comps, and settlement comps are from much larger corporate defendants, limiting precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityS.D. Fla.2026-10-29$65K–$780K
comparable settlements