S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-27699
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALM SPRINGS MILE ASSOCIATES, LTD.source ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-27699 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$780K ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows ADA Title III claims fail if plaintiff can't prove proposed modifications are effective, while Holmes v. Bax affirms ADA violations can survive summary judgment; outcomes split heavily on fact-specific remediation proof. Comparable settlements $65K–$780K median $365K · n=4 The Container Stor $780K · Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — dismissal affirmed because plaintiff bore burden to show modification was reasonable/effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead/prove specific, effective architectural modifications, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $4K–$75K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; ADA Title III yields no per-member damages, so 'class size' and settlement figures reflect single-plaintiff fee/remediation costs, not aggregate payouts. · grounded in 8 rulings, 4 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-10-29 | $65K–$780K comparable settlements |