← Records

POLANCO v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC

E.D. Pa. · No. 5:26-cv-08213

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLCsource ↗
filed by Garibian Law Offices PC · Judge Joseph F. Leeson Jr. · No. 5:26-cv-08213 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $2.45M–$100M ▾
FCRA claims against CRAs like Equifax often survive dismissal on accuracy/reinvestigation theories, but Minano v. DLJ shows many FCRA private-right-of-action claims get dismissed for lack of statutory basis. Equifax's repeat-filer pattern (Harris x2, Ali, Porter, McClary) suggests routine individual suits rather than high-value class litigation.
Comparable settlements $2.45M–$100M median $7.86M · n=10
Equifax $100M · Equifax $30M · Equifax Informatio $30M
Per member (realized): ~$176 median · $25–$250 (n=4)
Comparable verdict: TransUnion $60M · TransUnion, LLC $40M
Key precedent: Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital — shows courts narrowly construe FCRA private rights of action, dismissing several counts outright; similar risk here.
Main risk: Dismissal of specific FCRA counts for lack of private right of action or insufficient pleading, as in Minano v. DLJ Mortgage Capital.
This defendant: Equifax faces repeated individual FCRA filings (Harris x2, Ali, Porter, McClary) indicating a pattern of routine disputes rather than systemic failures.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$12.50M
Case appears to be an individual filing, not a certified class action; class size and per-member figures are speculative absent confirmed class allegations. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts
FilingConsumer Credit (FCRA/FDCPA)E.D. Pa.2026-10-27$2.45M–$100M
comparable settlements